From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C3AA0546 for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 16:58:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2219540150; Thu, 27 May 2021 16:58:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-io1-f53.google.com (mail-io1-f53.google.com [209.85.166.53]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0DCD40143 for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 16:58:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-io1-f53.google.com with SMTP id z24so780639ioi.3 for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 07:58:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=T0zJzSXVzfNJYObG4N+OI1/vJgumrjdEchN20MDA+hM=; b=cwpjVGpzYug6eVmfn8ajPXcuWlILqP1OPp+vFdqSrnSWze6VaO9x12p236Ghb2zEzj qfvOvkv3XMvkH1fAorZKUoze7JwAIfWZa3RRmowLg09UEibijvT1giyYLfu4U1HdVfHr ImSZRELEmnAELv/rTINQ5NDxICdl+RgDhSGhDR23NNaI7AbsgbjbSKmb9OcWTNet2eTn ORkcJSbuzX+u/NFWpp6JEmQSvDzfPjiriQUfSgMRM92tTXpEmL02Nnyam9/F5PiLYPkM 4qgwAssSO9sI0nRcnPcJGmcraz8u+UTE6jpFVDKgsuwgD5PFw/kvJGR1RBfwicY2R0j6 JKYQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=T0zJzSXVzfNJYObG4N+OI1/vJgumrjdEchN20MDA+hM=; b=K96aqwrA1pLHN7V4UDhUkD0gVh61ULe9uOjbvApPBSk8Glq+6LYAav8I6MgU91VfyJ qBSzF1jnG/71lFF4tPuz9OcYQurmkk1r+cH+WDUWxnzFy5ig0er9/OQx+nS9YaQvJMZu ohOR4tYbHxgheyrwNMprRsCWKVJyVhI7HKxeShwEnKUT4YHPcEbngQrzvVsE60t6NZrJ 8uCTnd/7rUOe2hwM7M2MPhCUF0TtV38p4XueqgoI+IBnUN31pGh1hiKru9+wIYMwozkN gLxEi0Y2f229GemkpGNq74IqUyAlKmgityhb1y6wPhoirPQYKn5XnFw5nt+PHHzjPI9Y Uc5w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533BPC6UiZv/VsSM0PFw4qR1aInp3AIDxkPck2/FKpmea/UsRHc+ OJoy+7I3Iyx2L1fAChLXYDayiK1PpiINzSij9dbQyp0R6l0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyLou9MeyFq0nsJ8YdK3JPaHY395+oCxuK2XBDJMa2H1b/Cl+rcK1E56Hn44XFyOsCzeMphiIlLqgyEgpS7Hso= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:118c:: with SMTP id f12mr3867082jas.143.1622127479729; Thu, 27 May 2021 07:57:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: madhukar mythri Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 20:27:48 +0530 Message-ID: To: users@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: [dpdk-users] Issue with UDP based fragmented packets on Azure cloud X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "users" Hi, We are facing issue with UDP/IP based fragmented packets on Azure cloud platform with Accelerated-Network enabled ports. UDP fragmented Rx packets were able to receive well on media ports. But, when two fragmented packet received, first fragment is received on Queue-0 and second fragment is received on Queue-1. Ideally all the fragments(of single large packet) should be received single queue based on RSS, so that we can re-assemble as single pkt and process it, which is working well in other platforms on KVM hyper-visors(with I40evf NIC=E2=80=99s). I think, the as per RSS hash cacluation all the fragmented pkts should reach on single-queue(because the 5-tuple hash value will be same), but this is not happening in-case of Azue VM's Why ? Does anybody faced similar issue, please let me know your suggestion. Thanks, Madhukar.