From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89508A034E for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 16:14:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57D0D4068C; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 16:14:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-vs1-f49.google.com (mail-vs1-f49.google.com [209.85.217.49]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 603FE4013F for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 16:14:38 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-vs1-f49.google.com with SMTP id t22so17916488vsa.4 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 07:14:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=jdpWlgQhQNqH7LjUXRd+Sr1gs2jpkW4Kq7vnWKlFOuU=; b=c8RNSd+CebJ0N0gJvECdiJ1m/SlDhmqQB2I5vYXwO7Vy2rpfOME6gep4uWKfO2WsvZ 3MS2pMYfDYoBW5upae/Mqeynt5PikiE92G2qxQ849wGOdr40ahuR7QrYPWPqZ6zsGiXw 9Ed03SOHg+C8XP/EWdQHw0JcDX4R1VyFmW8alMmXbq4oRBNUPZOd8nu44UtSbk2DaFNE dGJmi/ORbJ80Vg1k1KHDbaDuRBMax2dz24BRPeluSGc6n9wDM5njEkvSMo1tZdzrD9AX Xuy1d2wQq6YyRy7b2FLL3ArUs2N5HxDPmc5IyQlWagMyDt9NKdevcH94mi1b6h4gSaHx Ub2g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=jdpWlgQhQNqH7LjUXRd+Sr1gs2jpkW4Kq7vnWKlFOuU=; b=bnBToNs20mojoZcwDUYI4WEZVlPtSqnjbft0zu6dPNNe/rHvwoMVj5nODuFo/XpaWC 9ZrL1gHnnZMwg9DRXR3mYe7Cd9C2lLiWRxzYnG14l8wvhVdKqDCkeC7Sd+LcPkT6vUaZ GURAlDmMmMInBlW8qPXkpNkMQiUeB/vo/Cvke74gpXdv0MofJYNgRv5aXefVgVPovYoy 8ZMcu+fcjLPQeroINwnmOdWvanqUdC9Jx3Q+C7ramFZ1sMw+JHKgzRYdDGBgGKwisIU1 /zNWC1JUGBOaaaRPEcE72nmaZPWo+oQ0Jd7ziJKv8Es8kWTEf0K5+gXfxAIy8Jx9b3E7 7/9Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5312WGXi62pUrB6n0ySiwQZGwIlLif+WjJcNiFNV+KLeaiy4vOKp GVmO5V3gFDWQOMGdPOQMP3A4u5HFUvEOfn1fBItpzkBv X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyMuGi0muO/n8zY0AWp1CT9rWYfmEKUuEagHG2aXoQyzkvqK6G1J3cTpDIYLE1QYPF4dMrjAOAaB+FCbo5X1Yw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:4426:b0:31a:a5de:6da2 with SMTP id df38-20020a056102442600b0031aa5de6da2mr8384654vsb.73.1645456477652; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 07:14:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Staffan Wiklund Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 16:14:26 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Are Intel CPUs better than AMD CPUs for DPDK applications? To: users Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d809ec05d888b07c" X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org --000000000000d809ec05d888b07c Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hello Do you know if there is a difference in support for DPDK that is provided by Intel and AMD CPUs respectively? I talked to a person today claiming he has learned that Intel CPUs have been preferred over AMD CPUs for some DPDK applications. This person had no document showing reasons for this. Do you have any information on this? If there is a difference, will the difference be negligible do you think from a technical perspective? Regards Staffan --000000000000d809ec05d888b07c Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello

Do you know if there i= s a difference in support for DPDK that is provided by
Intel and = AMD CPUs respectively?

I talked to a person today = claiming he has learned that Intel CPUs have
been preferred over = AMD CPUs for some DPDK applications.
This person had no document = showing reasons for this.

Do you have any informat= ion on this?
If there is a difference, will the difference be neg= ligible do you think from a
technical perspective?
=

Regards
Staffan

=
--000000000000d809ec05d888b07c--