From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ua0-f179.google.com (mail-ua0-f179.google.com [209.85.217.179]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB86F72 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 12:38:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-ua0-f179.google.com with SMTP id k90so237140367uak.1 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 03:38:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=kiKd7lxPnsNN0oye3vhOtO6cDWUS6JqhByuQX+6A/Tg=; b=mVougD5kPtT1INgMTjRklAc18GvyoPSYlJFPSWPGfVdDL8Jmq2g3lLXTnILQ1bX3TL C/hBQxLK35Ne8+Wag9GtGfJgTm/rsKO/axk8U1bINnXwaapF5jvpH+8Ns4p3YRD2VtGp eEdeNimp+w48ij+KWAsSTApU/+RdyDT54LZT+UUl/SXE0KVYi6Hyg6RjNOJ19IXLJjhA ETMwAFcuNBuL+cX6ElBIm67OGa9iH1SQDoZnP9PS6uVH9z6HsHqS5aDHlTBCFh7LldUL D0+EZdr/jYej2a6keOloammwg2SCKebOJp0bv78k+j2aqXdXdsuYS4GyKUOtnHYk1m8y QWpA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kiKd7lxPnsNN0oye3vhOtO6cDWUS6JqhByuQX+6A/Tg=; b=cXjocvIm5zHBrkdBWzrqUBvHaCcSE1K/a6jdpGk9eNOeJOxGi50mN1iB663L/XYIcK 72687rSNs/UY4VkrazuCqbUb7kdwuv1TVx1HuYis61XJsy+MQco8fNtoKnCGqwcWKfJe cqRZz4a3/yUaBo35yyEEijbiCicOPq9OZOm4f5h9gO1SvmqTpZTTiduZFt/cLrqciRN5 SLRhHhS+yOsjOcbg8qJrmdtAnrUOzZBnCPXdcP4bJE7eW7Zlawu+vEBpIXzCdHNeRdZ/ UgLq3qSjm/FDf9O8fdKns7YAuoCMjJY62n6bICqkyVdUn6PAqxUQcYIAFR3F9i9CxHfs Yhiw== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkooutagBrW4Nn0Ibzu5RuZ7sM+jODxegp6JMyYgZXLZcL+yguAF4Ok9+uEoDdcbLLtLOezRADhMaQr+t6FXQ== X-Received: by 10.31.139.207 with SMTP id n198mr13954960vkd.121.1471948683268; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 03:38:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.31.182.200 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 03:38:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87r39fiybp.fsf@fatcat.parallelwireless> References: <87r39fiybp.fsf@fatcat.parallelwireless> From: Kapil Adhikesavalu Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:08:02 +0530 Message-ID: To: Anupam Kapoor Cc: users@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] DPDK port interrupt based link state notification X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 10:38:04 -0000 Hi Anupam Kapoor, Thanks for your input. I don't want to change the OVS code to add link notification handling. So, will i be able to run "OVS enabled dpdk" along with one more dpdk app which will handle just link notification alone; can this both be made to run in parallel ? kapil On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Anupam Kapoor wrote: > > >>>>> [2016-08-23T14:39:03+0530]: "Kapil Adhikesavalu" > (kaipl-adhikesavalu): > > ,----[ kaipl-adhikesavalu ] > | How can i use this application along with openvswitch; should i write > some > | code within ovs to register for ISR ? or is there a another way i can run > | this as a separate application without modifying ovs. > `---- > each dpdk application would need to handle such events on a case-by-case > basis. so, for your case, if ovs is dpdk enabled, then that's where > link-state-notifications would need to be handled. > > --- > thanks > anupam >