From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <kapil20084@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-ua0-f178.google.com (mail-ua0-f178.google.com
 [209.85.217.178]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32D943978
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 12:58:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-ua0-f178.google.com with SMTP id n59so237616160uan.2
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 03:58:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=94EnkGc/X2/geLDO8hSIYUSQjTfGfqgyN1l/iEoJdOI=;
 b=e336pFoNyj78i0X7R9JK7fMyKkwDVnCCpAsp5DYYeOpbb+oG2fELA5jp2SfgPB7Qem
 Z0z9u1ZfLmDDtYdU5EABlALlG7295WB4BMXtoW5sDQ8TOe3nVHNVUZzWT/WBmIC8po3W
 8YbyRCnwbwNS80uzbDK1ycM7A/wVt3X1OPHD4pB94rwom8Df6KWUfKMz5NqEJRj6UoOp
 8n8TLqAu1TaKykTCeRuPwyIfGnVazb5ncncoxNTNBn3y7VwDfaXLGQtGLzqMgan/WU5g
 ZYc1YUcRFpJsHNufADRUA6VzGJeBIJho+OyvCx2oDraRLUj+p9MRhpRv9jQHosefgFha
 fa0A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=94EnkGc/X2/geLDO8hSIYUSQjTfGfqgyN1l/iEoJdOI=;
 b=lxenypdB6mQd3pz3uXomDE5zIGxiQ83wVIesWLHeHzsUBy9k184ZbRN11Rf+ereemt
 rLxv2e1axENwkx2+j9W8eDefwc8Nx7uugK5fvGCMqg1jVxqCIi8SfmHipDhmVEpaT2h0
 /WIDz2EIc29B3LWZTovafhsd0c4PL/GmGCaowV3m0XOuBu0Pe65x6Ji628GP4hHk4Gqy
 D7IEjS+Edr+/iPCP0CJRsviCCtEEFCKFa82GCpmmtgOzHCK4XsRHfSehczlnzx3sya02
 Se02axDV7vWFkL/77TkFiiialpVXdjEQm4LWmvqlRTkz+28r1KaDDUiGG05wchafm+JS
 vVxA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouswHJvHifgBW2p9rAmYfHdzLmI/5qcpUmzF9bjoV9l10ZnUjuYlIsqWRCmK/ceYOMHkDX8HdGomfRMn6Q==
X-Received: by 10.31.244.77 with SMTP id s74mr4415502vkh.126.1471949922750;
 Tue, 23 Aug 2016 03:58:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.182.200 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 03:58:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87oa4jiwwt.fsf@fatcat.parallelwireless>
References: <CAAu6pRdi_trpvgz08zRghLXzFdvwv-SdFAVT9PByEeafg_dGjg@mail.gmail.com>
 <87r39fiybp.fsf@fatcat.parallelwireless>
 <CAAu6pRe_qrN+rfTo_dDgOvP4fm8-gGSmwn7h5vg=g5WXp+bEtw@mail.gmail.com>
 <87oa4jiwwt.fsf@fatcat.parallelwireless>
From: Kapil Adhikesavalu <kapil20084@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:28:42 +0530
Message-ID: <CAAu6pRfW9FhR_GvZzKLzuAfB4RA1yCf-may2ZyvWZ=eRgWku0w@mail.gmail.com>
To: anupam kapoor <anupam.kapoor@gmail.com>
Cc: users@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] DPDK port interrupt based link state notification
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 10:58:43 -0000

Thanks for the info.

Regards
Kapil.

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:18 PM, anupam kapoor <anupam.kapoor@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> >>>>> [2016-08-23T16:08:02+0530]: "Kapil Adhikesavalu"
> (kapil-adhikesavalu):
>
> ,----[ kapil-adhikesavalu ]
> | So, will i be able to run "OVS enabled dpdk" along with one more dpdk app
> | which will handle just link notification alone; can this both be made to
> | run in parallel ?
> `----
> probably not. multiple dpdk applications sharing same queues will cause
> problems e.g. weird lockups etc.
>
> ---
> thanks
> anupam
>