From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C935A0C42 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 10:33:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AC4C410FB; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 10:33:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-ot1-f44.google.com (mail-ot1-f44.google.com [209.85.210.44]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E9264013F for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 12:18:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-ot1-f44.google.com with SMTP id 66-20020a9d02c80000b02903615edf7c1aso19754188otl.13 for ; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 03:18:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=cjfbCGD9w2wd+dAhxHksud2lLvTFhmuGDy8vgg4FHKw=; b=oOHbzvfVkEmnlKS6aprumhR2k8nf9tMtlGOqKtv4oqhkj1jmb3z3lyubsGkW9dUwVC 1DmBi3oBvJkA2t8T0FOnCcYvqJkoKOyFI4vnSxiz7qaoEiLYBtlYd/BWirb0R9YaeGJF YSYmARgCfYdr76fCC+4Fb755Twir2jxdhImdpuRzN0n628QjZyIOQfuxDS09+QCDwWP/ G5C3lSTAYxF9BoLXykCokwkdNayL2ZTAYFYaRROigaTV+cY0yMU4ZgpMLoRD+0NaCMSX /i3grsj4PKMAA1u7d/tywR2wXW557aE4EjkjUVXSTJA6xN5BQW17mWIdHY8b1HgqP5f8 j0WQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=cjfbCGD9w2wd+dAhxHksud2lLvTFhmuGDy8vgg4FHKw=; b=FWt83kVLCaw9heJkcYnT8GWJ8iRWRFYdQjmEY73cTd0P7BnHTeimU3wtafQmwJ5YKa YHo/Vv2PzXo3gJEAhU8+if07b5c91wtFK7YjFP3usKOgosbpT4myDP0cXnEkVBZOzjIT 3T32JyI5pBuKE2RdBPmoYKei+BoAhuv0uICHnZUuNxbi6KQ610cOb6fZ3x4Sur1y7tv3 yFjEZFh3jZlZKxbP7OPNqVo2aaUn6kQgAa7Wb3P4fnDYTh/w1/N7cRKFYxv8RO8dxL7X wsvTI6/idiKvoAqKuzi5qmnfhwBlkWvgPecz2hGjqGh/N/bh2fGUZwzvWahNyFQ/DsfH S9jQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530ulBAIfc1NlrejQie8knHUGOyf7eBO4AtU0BrnKpp+Udfslzz4 mcQcJ40QYgzvPJ8VFxTr5rmv+xJ1spRmsLdUVewDx5+hFePWIc7m X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyVdmfJGWqvy6JcSZOy8zcWbtreU3WezMRbmb8rlSen/1/aZWAK541jsmSCDlF7LmYkOhN516gRzZiuUtsjB+Y= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:4a1:: with SMTP id 30mr17535385otm.133.1623147502247; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 03:18:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Linyih Teng Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 18:18:11 +0800 Message-ID: To: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 10:33:53 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: [dpdk-users] 82599ES 10-Gigabit NIC can't use timesync? X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "users" Hello, I'm trying to capture rx/tx timestamp using *rte_eth_timesync_rx/tx_read()* functions but it always returns EINVAL. Does the* 82599ES* NIC(with *igb_uio*) support the timesync function to capture Tx/Rx timestamp? My system and hardware info are below: linux-headers-5.4.0-72-generic/bionic-updates,bionic-security,now 5.4.0-72.80~18.04.1 amd64 DPDK-20.08 82599ES NIC bind with igb_uio Thanks, Lin