From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E256841DC6 for ; Fri, 3 Mar 2023 11:33:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7958240687; Fri, 3 Mar 2023 11:33:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-lf1-f50.google.com (mail-lf1-f50.google.com [209.85.167.50]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A3D0400D6 for ; Fri, 3 Mar 2023 11:33:33 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-lf1-f50.google.com with SMTP id f18so2995125lfa.3 for ; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 02:33:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1677839612; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ufobqEPHp0KpMpTaonamMfelK5q/EckZ4rH2tiLlaL0=; b=VvwGa/3B7xyKnbNEJz7sZfemdFt3Xj5JWGnRXo1CzzYbb+A+qwUucRoOenLx9Zbcb/ cauBTX0k2TEoGpFa+rIRXc3tzR4FZyGBwhSxuvWbGWMXhdmpgw03k3TtVELdjeALFUyM F3oo+GaTcrXwzIOBlkurx/81xWt9RYzzoHL7UPrUHmwF29cGp2PvpTmBy8W0D23fJ2uu UPtB+ZiG0eXwZlK8qHGZAgWpdUsHAJtBVasAdhI+k/Fs31Dh+/XNWf/3TQS7p7xn+l70 085fMgp0UptuZ2+WPiHCBj2PlN+8+vb6zuTGuzFuCVOxRemM3yGlLStLX+3yxg+ni8fm BKMQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1677839612; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ufobqEPHp0KpMpTaonamMfelK5q/EckZ4rH2tiLlaL0=; b=nChGguANJ5Q9LbtqvsmOTU0touiVNasV2MZbYJ4sD/kwqZHK+YCm7HQ1TpXlWJmISH aSH07opk/fDzyCDY3yjkLWq15ZYp0+D8m/engw2BtUUExDB7UDtr2CJnU7/9leEeY5N9 jS8QdGu7U0t5YtrZ1PITHLaUMs0CsQVx4Y/RukM9Ma12XbM9XUnRRQ9ZYQOpo/LTr8hs 8+yKKqZYIe0N7r9LHGMWPpax85hPR5XCFfkUpMEJDofaC27/z5iXqD8zEg0oZBXvkpyf IICsiUCuMytSIcn3DVjMqAMQR5FHVvOto1ptdBV8F+piNBqQ5v6XLIViLDw4j2yTYEKt Zt8Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKWEmVqMhWS0txF5eB431j+DxEUDCr2LR9hRw7KAWgmNxQ1nARZ7 PLiFhljl5NqBeDK3RsH5NJY0TiOwbcKsa1hdqbYpbLCOFVg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set+UF3TjZdZznA9WJprANKFlaXPy21hqFlZaZ3nteDpoGfTBApKAUDu7USMbv0BRunMemQGKPjXZ9V79lN+sWQs= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:539c:0:b0:4d5:ca42:e43b with SMTP id g28-20020ac2539c000000b004d5ca42e43bmr489722lfh.4.1677839611890; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 02:33:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Isaac Boukris Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2023 12:33:20 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Multi-process limitations when using the dumpcap tool To: users@dpdk.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000e8fad05f5fc7a30" X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org --0000000000000e8fad05f5fc7a30 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hello, The dumpcap documentation points out that it runs as a secondary process, as such I was wondering whether the multi-process limitations such as the requirement to disable ASLR on both processes, and more importantly the limitations regarding the use of librte_hash, also apply when using the dumpcap tool? Thanks! --0000000000000e8fad05f5fc7a30 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello,

The dumpcap documentation=C2=A0p= oints out that it runs as a secondary process, as such I was wondering whet= her the multi-process limitations=C2=A0such as the requirement to disable A= SLR on both processes, and more importantly the limitations regarding the u= se of=C2=A0librte_hash, also apply when using the dumpcap tool?
<= br>
Thanks!
--0000000000000e8fad05f5fc7a30--