DPDK usage discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Hart <tony.hart@domainhart.com>
To: users@dpdk.org
Subject: Performance of CX7 with 3 flow groups versus 2
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 05:53:49 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAC6tBwxS3qn43oQjmCAwHdL35V7qNa64q8e=oz97=5P+7svBAA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2152 bytes --]

I'm seeing an unexpected performance drop on the CX7 when using 3 groups
(with a policer) versus 3 groups (without policer) versus (2 groups without
policer).  The performance of each configuration is  72 Gbps, 104 Gbps and
124 Gbps respectively.   So the first configuration drops to almost half
the performance of the third even though all 3 are just hairpinning packets
(the policier is used to color the packet only, no fate actions are taken
as a result).

This is on a 400G link and using SWS mode.  I know there was a similar
issue reported on this mailing list recently related to SWS versus HWS
performance, but this issue seems different.

Any thoughts welcome.

thanks
tony

These are the testpmd commands used to recreate the issue...


*Common commands:*add port meter profile trtcm_rfc4115 0 1 1000 150000000
1000 1000 1

add port meter policy 0 1 g_actions end y_actions end r_actions drop  / end

create port meter 0 1 1 1 yes 0xffff 0 g 0



*3 groups with policer*
flow create 0 ingress group 0 pattern end actions jump group 1 / end

flow create 0 ingress group 1 pattern end actions meter mtr_id 1 / jump
group 2 / end

flow create 0 ingress group 2 pattern eth / ipv4 / end actions count / rss
queues 6 7 8 9 end / end



*3 groups without policer*
flow create 0 ingress group 0 pattern end actions jump group 1 / end

flow create 0 ingress group 1 pattern end actions jump group 2 / end

flow create 0 ingress group 2 pattern eth / ipv4 / end actions count / rss
queues 6 7 8 9 end / end



*2 groups without policer*
flow create 0 ingress group 0 pattern end actions jump group 1 / end

flow create 0 ingress group 1 pattern eth / ipv4 / end actions count / rss
queues 6 7 8 9 end / end

thanks,
tony

*testpmd command line*
/dpdk-testpmd -l8-14 -a81:00.0,dv_flow_en=1 -- -i --nb-cores 6 --rxq 6
--txq 6 --port-topology loop --forward-mode=rxonly --hairpinq 4
--hairpin-mode 0x10


*Versions*
mlnx-ofa_kernel-24.04-OFED.24.04.0.6.6.1.rhel9u4.x86_64
kmod-mlnx-ofa_kernel-24.04-OFED.24.04.0.6.6.1.rhel9u4.x86_64
mlnx-ofa_kernel-devel-24.04-OFED.24.04.0.6.6.1.rhel9u4.x86_64
ofed-scripts-24.04-OFED.24.04.0.6.6.x86_64

DPDK: v24.03

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2570 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2024-06-28  9:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-28  9:53 Tony Hart [this message]
2024-06-29 18:42 ` Tony Hart

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAC6tBwxS3qn43oQjmCAwHdL35V7qNa64q8e=oz97=5P+7svBAA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=tony.hart@domainhart.com \
    --cc=users@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).