From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 821B9461A6 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2025 06:45:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA20402F1; Thu, 6 Feb 2025 06:45:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-pj1-f41.google.com (mail-pj1-f41.google.com [209.85.216.41]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A21E402D6 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2025 06:45:09 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pj1-f41.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2f43d17b0e3so871228a91.0 for ; Wed, 05 Feb 2025 21:45:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1738820708; x=1739425508; darn=dpdk.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=tyRmOCFQzNayQx8z8m2lFs1J4Om+SOgzw0eThK89fe8=; b=Z+svXTzETbUkXcBR3KneMhBrLZQXO+zG7yNEB6u84V5xOpoI7cvSlGMiefBrjPmA2V uWgoER1IrQXf7jBclrs45sOpgKTqu2OElpVWcSCUVE0cClSXV2k4nsmn2UnPhyNxNqml sRyhwkzzmlRFNbz4pUxR5Ny9LNeQ+XGtCqGQPLf1dznlmna6+s1Q52XjmNsLUOBfLMT0 MoqFrtlYSlPUTbX8cO/+kUb37OUSuhjOLILrimS1OeRo3F/P3xYjgVzrfI4+K2IxWAs5 hYGfWMAVVD+8nPwNdnuDpMTyyGvbX2ZBcV8p1fUJsfb25AT1sVfOaBiHB5NM1ZzJ/l8f rDUA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1738820708; x=1739425508; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=tyRmOCFQzNayQx8z8m2lFs1J4Om+SOgzw0eThK89fe8=; b=k9dGIMQIL12epnXBLoE7gOx0PeAaKdHZlQ+LMnYXjeSoFgwRIu4DlQtLw4EhOZlqDx +KlfiLRvyrKyuGpdARkG5+6X752pjweYNw995sxLjsmucah46umQXjuf+YZkq6ADxk24 K1y0yenk5O+tEJnkO5fDqxKBbUsVVDMKY0ft5GnYeCwVtmBWh0DVhDkqYPF3J8hXKamh Ja0jwGGZDbSSPQLGUXmf6d+r/fscIBIrs5QQRJBWSkIULnWqkOtWge9q6eWNirq7tGy/ QJghqDeieAclO0Sb7mFp8ZmAP1kgSWV8iaCnca+jarAImegJiBq/ZUvuEWbsKyP/9wTD 5Zqw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwWI3kT9j0f/LLAOmqG4vQrbOe0xKEaVkej3s5fYN9xKwKHfnBB /dYFhwa6njHLfkV1UDxSugSbMzVZAVQ5siOnL7As1kk1ACzZxI3jZzLBZwSGWco56zX06EtG/XH gP5rxRwWyUqj4VgcMcb8r6GRxbante3L8 X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctydxBoKUgKrkGeExpcJZZpKT3DXF3ENtgF6icD34CU5h3PkbKdHzc8w7lMEN1 MqptdGfYhywh4fHz/gidA+Hk/uKRUpI60ftzxKTZNMnW1ByWjoOuLnB9gkFvGxOue/P1ezwuXD7 ZEb8QJNl8Df9MmrWyTOpzG4k4p4oQTn0w= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGKgEUtwTNXsmezt/7KoBAHE7b7+2SaDGlsK65PHsx5Y6hhC7RLCSe6GU6CQDh3zXVOtdB3cSIzkjFkwoA8HcE= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:33c4:b0:2ee:9b2c:3253 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2f9e084fcd6mr8509026a91.30.1738820708504; Wed, 05 Feb 2025 21:45:08 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Lokesh Chakka Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 11:14:57 +0530 X-Gm-Features: AWEUYZkBghouquGXfUXoDyjk7iczGx5zhX2157NSNWkEwutEXNEc7Ti-N8a8mqM Message-ID: Subject: stats inconsistency To: users Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a89c87062d72be64" X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org --000000000000a89c87062d72be64 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hello, I was trying to send packets on one interface and capture on another interface both connected b2b without any DUT in between. While sending packets, the value returned by rte_eth_tx_burst is not consistent with opackets / oerrors returned by rte_eth_stats_get even after a few seconds. None of port 0 Tx stats are consistent with port 1 Rx stats stats. The value returned by rte_eth_rx_burst is consistent with ipackets. Still ipackets/ierrors/imissed of port 1 are not consistent with opackets/oerrors of port 0. Is there a way to achieve consistency among all ? Thanks & Regards -- Lokesh Chakka. --000000000000a89c87062d72be64 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello,

I was trying to send = packets on one interface and capture on another interface both connected b2= b without any DUT in between.
While sending packets, t= he value returned by=C2=A0 rte_eth_tx_burst is not consistent with opackets= / oerrors returned by rte_eth_stats_get even after a few seconds.
None of port 0 Tx stats are consistent with port 1 Rx stats stats.
<= div>The value returned by rte_eth_rx_burst is consistent with ipackets.
Still ipackets/ierrors/imissed of port 1 are not consistent with opa= ckets/oerrors of port 0.
Is there a way to achieve consistenc= y among all ?


Thanks & Regards
--
Lokesh Chakka.
=
--000000000000a89c87062d72be64--