hi stephen, Thanks for your response. However it seems the solution is not working. The following is the modified snippet.... while( condition ) { for( pkt_count=0; pkt_count wrote: > On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 15:55:50 +0530 > Lokesh Chakka wrote: > > > hello, > > > > Here is a small piece of code : > > > > while( condition ) > > { > > > > if( rte_eth_tx_burst( port_id, 0, mbuf, num_of_pkts_per_queue ) != > > num_of_pkts_per_queue ) > > { > > fprintf( stderr, "%d %s\n", rte_errno, > rte_strerror(rte_errno) ); > > rte_exit( EXIT_FAILURE, "%s %d rte_eth_tx_burst port id: > %u\n", > > __func__, __LINE__, port_id );//second iteration failing. > > } > > fprintf( stderr, "%s %d port: %u packet: %c sent %u packets\n", > > __func__, __LINE__, port_id, argv[3][0], num_of_pkts_per_queue > > );//printing once > > for( pkt_count=0; pkt_count > {//want to send same data again...!!! > > mbuf[pkt_count]->pkt_len = mbuf[pkt_count]->data_len = > dev_info.max_mtu; > > > > } > > > > } > > > > Can someone help me understand how to reuse the packets again to send the > > same data ? > > > > When packet is passed to tx_burst, the ownership of that mbuf is passed > to the driver. The driver will free it after it is sent. > > One option would be to increase the reference count on the packet before > sending. > Using rte_mbuf_refcnt_update() function to add one to refcount. > Then the driver will decrement refcount and the refcount will still be one > (not freed). > > Assume this is some kind of packet generator. >