From: rahul s <rs1041447@gmail.com>
To: users@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-users] dpdk hash performance
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 19:58:23 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACq9gPxvKPR_-uRZRUZvZnE0kU767p+wd4U4oWMJRt5Vpxo2ww@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hi,
I am using rte_hash library with parameters as 2k entries with rte_jhash
function with key len as 8 bytes.And key I am using here is just 64 bit
unsigned integer .
Similarly I am looking on c ++ std:unorder_map<unsignet int 64,struct
*>map with similar entries .
I am just doing lookup with 20 keys aginsts 2k entries and the through
put performance dip around <=4gbps using rte_hash when compared to
std:unorder_map in 100G line .Is there any way to scale the performance
using the rte_hash library...
with regards,
Rahul
reply other threads:[~2020-10-02 7:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CACq9gPxvKPR_-uRZRUZvZnE0kU767p+wd4U4oWMJRt5Vpxo2ww@mail.gmail.com \
--to=rs1041447@gmail.com \
--cc=users@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).