From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <anupam.kapoor@gmail.com> Received: from mail-oi0-f68.google.com (mail-oi0-f68.google.com [209.85.218.68]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC01A2B98 for <users@dpdk.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 08:43:16 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-oi0-f68.google.com with SMTP id j15so27749147oih.0 for <users@dpdk.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 23:43:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=VoU0Br9jxt52P3lpwf6ryANj02o6q6gAk6EJhPG20Gg=; b=HPxyxlCxIBFNw8yv8zJqx9dcx/AAkDxJ/fyff1tXLvXJltdD1zt9fYWQ524pKGr6Eb Zv4sz6RH6DI+KrKFRNB300wIWoH+kbN98aV3BHh1ncMTEDrRSFID9qH/K6vSSE/YQbwp bSvK2jtWagU7UBZQHMyHcwo7GldykD3QlCyEGH5zUpHy3P87lP2p1WPAE0/BuNTiVtSW PXPvP5HAgQ4SBdJwTqxPQQxYTGM9b1H1XL79WdSfZCYBK/u34ATJBI6GSNJMSUXNg/Zg sgj6bCLxyTTEHZhhelN/MId5KHCkCewfg+K/i+7bfmfgSP5JRftFD60Xd9cRTxcIjBt6 +gwg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VoU0Br9jxt52P3lpwf6ryANj02o6q6gAk6EJhPG20Gg=; b=QopRJiotkx08b+/ZKXVBZmbcNqUK9EWHPTxKvKvUNE8+njqwlH22ix5P30b/Zq5x/U 8J1u5GXyrcxPiDG0kDQExgf/ulzc/tDlQqmswc3Q23rN//B92biVlC/zh1H89Y+xxHQ9 U8Xlx8jPMroXvCZcgWu5PtiN1A1eglfY3VtWTf77TCqmFra7Tc6ONu09PcpjaiWM2bZe XBRpTHx8qgeQUfh/P2V1/fV0teBgS+7sc0wOwyDPz8d9lm0XC8i4YPE7LqDEgjn6UwEi yIOFUN9ZWnbNoHs7eDBB6GD40GFoONS4RQZpt88Ykqjlpr8PFppgSYemnPDj4CTKRbwv od/w== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKyVbR1QE/jPHweQ4906wOJs1MmHtfd/pTb4q5cWRa9Z4QchB5xh5tP655rqZqQe0rNiKS2QOhCzlL5+A== X-Received: by 10.202.117.210 with SMTP id q201mr12711685oic.126.1485848595884; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 23:43:15 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.202.73.148 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 23:43:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20170131024249.GA5154@mhcomputing.net> References: <CA+xQHXofVjeb8c13koFHh571HOqXk6g5+G1jVW5e97V3eSmXKg@mail.gmail.com> <20170130230909.GA2194@mhcomputing.net> <20170130152046.3a47169f@xeon-e3> <20170131024249.GA5154@mhcomputing.net> From: Anupam Kapoor <anupam.kapoor@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 13:13:15 +0530 Message-ID: <CAEXHiZF=OfASnkZjFU0UTwP50iVRrz_w-CpVv0BgtrTQCmsOkg@mail.gmail.com> To: Matthew Hall <mhall@mhcomputing.net> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>, Primus Mutasingwa <pmutasingwa@gmail.com>, users@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] DPDK beginer: Best way to try out DPDK on a laptop with unsupported NIC X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>, <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/> List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>, <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 07:43:17 -0000 On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 8:12 AM, Matthew Hall <mhall@mhcomputing.net> wrote= : > vmxnet3 and virtio-net support in DPDK are both broken in VirtualBox. I > =E2=80=8Bhow about kvm+qemu combination. those seem to work fine for me. ym= mv (tm) -- kind regards anupam=E2=80=8B In the beginning was the lambda, and the lambda was with Emacs, and Emacs was the lambda.