From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <users-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B070A04B6
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 21:17:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECA09F04;
	Mon, 24 Aug 2020 21:17:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-lf1-f52.google.com (mail-lf1-f52.google.com
 [209.85.167.52]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D01C3E07
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 21:17:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-lf1-f52.google.com with SMTP id d2so5094536lfj.1
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:17:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=BOPVcx5f6BRQQnv8Bbhq75YTKleVwFgICPEfgK4ihH8=;
 b=TMvcCCkJcwXCGldVjkrUtM8R1IvftCjlW54zlSW9u1gMxEuCY3O0n8/OWgO2o2FAxV
 t6HxYHVyK9eyHyNmrozPu8juPCu8nQY5bNi2VTJCi41iSgZsCEziUyLw5xFoRQlQwtgM
 HMU/cU/nl7p69qJ0Uh3Vu1qkd/c+fGA5A7rkSUbZwcwO74gBtwZ3z6h83aH8wR9kmcgW
 g5Ha3VhOhpfqEngGVBg3qTU2uX7VpM5GS09T1+ItRqEw1XbapAp8kn58uaShL/zQ6ZLN
 b9lrJCDOUUSu3jeexxMiX/ZlUPoHdeo7aCcn3T8FABYToRCgenEBOPIijgTBs4KdRGvO
 QXJA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=BOPVcx5f6BRQQnv8Bbhq75YTKleVwFgICPEfgK4ihH8=;
 b=m8ZAts0GsGGJYgMSaRjV0SpNvgA6aMrD6fjrQFUDNixdwVNe8hBbPiO0ShnZu1ZgB/
 tTHO+9UhEl+PF5n8Vz6KnWByHbeUzSzRvPCb8lmm5tC9dRHk9kscbswzXsyAuZ1oVsHl
 4hq7vNRYSuRjnOU8OAezDOelSicd7J7eojdBNCfzN9WAzSNqw0ZStANhpnYwFfp3F9eo
 rP6y63YMqqNrTQ/wHgGnvs49F8/WRsECv5zGzDyuwEDkK/Z5C2VCKlpZLCWomPlmDiqy
 5hskzSBSWho6Zo1xpAa4uly5rKgp04AWam6wz9bQ/NlCxPx+C6+EHU2Fa1mtN5l4Qw3J
 4eHA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ueXMMzKKYf/2PTOereJNonMF+fZeA4d8RYwYkJM9a0j4XOVbr
 TL33VeOmnGx5alYWNy8ovBBDsccCuIspjIwcpNs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwaA/vXzvXrUTpjT7jmfh+y3RsqFnQhQ9iupIzn86WTTnCtsSEhSy7CrZtAZhOjWpOwRwuyp2ZVaBae73U7Oyc=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:752:: with SMTP id
 c18mr3183193lfs.53.1598296641344; 
 Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:17:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <767cf587-90b4-2eab-bd0d-667b862b50e8@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <767cf587-90b4-2eab-bd0d-667b862b50e8@gmail.com>
From: Erez Ferber <erezferber@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 22:17:10 +0300
Message-ID: <CAF5_M5gu8QqrQJc0Z19j4kosN_8zY8x0avsHW4GtkQy5xexiQg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alireza Sanaee <sarsanaee@gmail.com>
Cc: users@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Low throughput when pushing multiple priorities
 within a VLAN
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "users" <users-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hi,

Which NIC are you using ?

Thanks,
Erez

On Mon, 24 Aug 2020 at 11:34 Alireza Sanaee <sarsanaee@gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
>
>
> I'd like to push two flows with two different priorities from a NIC to
>
> the network. If I use same priority for my flows, they'll be pushed at
>
> the line rate. However, when I pick two different VLAN priorities,
>
> throughput reduces drastically.
>
>
>
> Is there anything wrong with my NIC configuration?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alireza
>
>
>
>