DPDK usage discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gaurav Bansal <zeebee48@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: users@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] packet drops with missing rxdIdx count in vmxnet3
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 11:22:19 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFQQEmDWQ5b31VP3t=WCxL-gLW2J7JM6JXXDiwDxwHB01m6yjg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFQQEmDwW636sVw_YKwmdaGDZD13R=3vfGAeezfe_RJaOyF6QA@mail.gmail.com>

hi all,
havn't heard back on this so far. Can anyone please let me know of the
possible reasons for the NIC to skip some of the indexes of the descriptor
ring in the Rx path (as also shown by the vmxnet3 logs in my previous mail)
?
thanks,
gaurav

On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 2:17 PM Gaurav Bansal <zeebee48@gmail.com> wrote:

> hi all,
> Tried to debug this further and found that there is a skip in the rxdIdx
> count as seen in the logs below. And 'rxdIdx' index is incremented by the
> NIC itself. Any ideas on why the 'rxdIdx' count (say 5 as seen below) may
> be missing ? Any suggestions to try to find the root cause of missing rx
> index ?
>
> PMD: vmxnet3_recv_pkts(): rxd idx: 0 ring idx: 0.
> PMD: vmxnet3_recv_pkts(): rxd idx: 1 ring idx: 0.
> PMD: vmxnet3_recv_pkts(): rxd idx: 2 ring idx: 0.
> PMD: vmxnet3_recv_pkts(): rxd idx: 3 ring idx: 0.
> PMD: vmxnet3_recv_pkts(): *rxd idx: 4* ring idx: 0.
> PMD: vmxnet3_recv_pkts(): *rxd idx: 6* ring idx: 0.
> PMD: vmxnet3_recv_pkts(): rxd idx: 7 ring idx: 0.
>
> thanks,
> gaurav
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 1:25 PM Gaurav Bansal <zeebee48@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Stephen for the reply. I am planning to try that but that will
>> require some major changes & lot more time, as this library is tightly
>> integrated with our code base. Meanwhile please let me know if there is
>> anything that can be tried on 16.04 itself.
>> thanks,
>> gaurav
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 10:46 AM Stephen Hemminger <
>> stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 10:45:03 +0530
>>> Gaurav Bansal <zeebee48@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > any suggestions here ?
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 4:09 PM Gaurav Bansal <zeebee48@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Hi all,
>>> > > I am using dpdk 16.04 library to process the packets on a vmware vm
>>> (say
>>> > > vm1). The traffic is sent through a client machine using apache
>>> bench. I am
>>> > > observing an issue when the number of packets reaching the vmxnet3
>>> > > interface reaches the descriptor ring size (set to 2048). Till 2048
>>> all the
>>> > > packets correctly reach the 'vmxnet3_recv_pkts' function.
>>> > >
>>> > > But as the number of packets received reaches 2048, i start seeing
>>> some
>>> > > retransmissions on the client side (as shown by tcpdump on client
>>> side).
>>> > > Then i captured the packets on the esx host destined to vm1 and it
>>> shows
>>> > > that all the original packets as well as the corresponding
>>> retransmissions
>>> > > are reaching vm1. But somehow these packets fail to reach till
>>> > > 'vmxnet3_recv_pkts' function (this was found by putting the
>>> breakpoint in
>>> > > 'vmxnet3_recv_pkts' function and dumping the packet contents, which
>>> showed
>>> > > that some packets don't reach here).
>>> > >
>>> > > Now 'vmxnet3_recv_pkts' is the first function which reads the
>>> packets from
>>> > > the descriptor ring and as the packets are not reaching till here, i
>>> am not
>>> > > sure on how to debug this further. Possibly some issues related to
>>> the ring
>>> > > initialization.... I enabled the init & RX logs for vmxnet3, but i
>>> don't
>>> > > see any error logs as well. I also tried looking at rxq stats and it
>>> shows
>>> > > 0 all the time :
>>> > > (gdb) p rxq->stats
>>> > > $1 = {drop_total = 0, drop_err = 0, drop_fcs = 0,
>>> rx_buf_alloc_failure = 0}
>>> > >
>>> > > Can anyone please provide some clues on how to debug this further ?
>>> Are
>>> > > there any known issues related to this which have been fixed post
>>> 16.04
>>> > > version ?
>>> > > thanks,
>>> > > gaurav
>>> > >
>>>
>>> Try a newer version of DPDK first.
>>>
>>

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-30  5:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-25 10:39 [dpdk-users] packet drops seen once the no of rxd pkts reach the ring size Gaurav Bansal
2019-09-26  5:15 ` Gaurav Bansal
2019-09-26  5:16   ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-09-26  7:55     ` Gaurav Bansal
2019-09-28  8:47       ` [dpdk-users] packet drops with missing rxdIdx count in vmxnet3 Gaurav Bansal
2019-09-30  5:52         ` Gaurav Bansal [this message]
2019-09-30 14:59           ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-10-09  6:11             ` Gaurav Bansal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAFQQEmDWQ5b31VP3t=WCxL-gLW2J7JM6JXXDiwDxwHB01m6yjg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=zeebee48@gmail.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=users@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).