From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <users-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 658B0A0C41
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Thu,  4 Nov 2021 15:09:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CFAB42719;
	Thu,  4 Nov 2021 15:09:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-yb1-f176.google.com (mail-yb1-f176.google.com
 [209.85.219.176])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A05204003E
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 05:48:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-yb1-f176.google.com with SMTP id y80so13376227ybe.12
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 20:48:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=mEIu3WrLkTbvFrnnQ+O4oivvF1Z0Zvv/oTWTKb1tNR8=;
 b=IAtqIxoB+K8c1KfgFuI5g+h2HBH73WUpUgSQG0CxEh4xG259OOwIfwBMppb+0wMfYu
 QhiPvdvkVWNsbDywVQP01rrLnMw32ovK/IhBV5Mx7DLToTMOFwCjn28g5fD/K6hVda7f
 V5MdctZD5DobujFVC+n7LF4vHRwiZ4mDmUKIb63v7XUX2wNCWnIjkWbCldBvIs5NHJ0o
 hbhcE7nkPPRKANjr7W0q4aFKZloTTuEQe+mvUAECkNj3oin0tBC+n6F/qak7V8An6BF1
 sUPzfQ1Uw1mPkscMQHqPNdUU5aU5oJEwIPbDIKQuZ70c62eTaAMDrsmGfqZbSB33F1w1
 0+rw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=mEIu3WrLkTbvFrnnQ+O4oivvF1Z0Zvv/oTWTKb1tNR8=;
 b=aR2k+nHhtFsvYaqFZeRzvVRBmZrlbE3PulxdqyvMgBp3Fxa+80vN78lsgK930HbiRk
 371AxJOLSrf2WZclxL2oKv3P7+gZMIgIaHypeMOQjqaILK59WQrq5ExuTCzGEopegs6u
 dz/7wPcrEqRsgsTtR+oDdxGBs446hWWWAs2u2UPGALoetByUZ8NsfhCWoHi2Q1RFutFA
 ykiDfe5T0bjiP0R7dqIINXSN6sAaV2U5rZXHvTvmbxR9VoCqL6CTpmxOkgYj12IKjU2J
 1omzekJTDThGcPxbqXOOAFFkQge/L3s7bVOUDeiqHLVWIJK01y1aopGIC2yQW63TN5FI
 J0Dw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532QTXObHS1OZNKuDl0+O0hczgJJvXUteqgUmO8GpT0P9oabUmJF
 hc9NnVuTZEAJMmKld8tycK/RQxDvSEujMdbgx6GR+ByyX3c=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxWAf9RIDj8EF1Km7TxkWfj8pNePmCJjp14wo5lJnAZtSd6ubOwCgNkYKc97Kok0TmBzQkCz2MPkYVPtAYpLDI=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6902:683:: with SMTP id
 i3mr6484342ybt.388.1635220087930; 
 Mon, 25 Oct 2021 20:48:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: =?UTF-8?B?6Zmz5YGl5paw?= <greensun1231@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 11:47:57 +0800
Message-ID: <CAFQzS=vOgTDpNuPM+9BNA-QHKL7cVCegPOkS+zPkprL=vNYUuw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Are KNI RX/TX burst API thread safe?
To: users@dpdk.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000078825105cf395889"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 04 Nov 2021 15:09:53 +0100
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org

--00000000000078825105cf395889
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hi all,

Are these two functions rte_kni_tx_burst and rte_kni_rx_burst thread safe?
Is that fine that I rx / tx the KNI with multiple lcore?
Is there protection against access from multiple lcore? Do I need to use a
lock to protect it?

The DPDK I am using is 17.05.2

thanks,
James

--00000000000078825105cf395889
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Hi all,<div><br></div><div>Are these two functions rte_kni=
_tx_burst and=C2=A0rte_kni_rx_burst thread safe?</div><div>Is that fine tha=
t I rx / tx the KNI with multiple lcore?</div><div>Is there protection agai=
nst access from multiple=C2=A0lcore? Do=C2=A0I need to use a lock to protec=
t it?</div><div><br></div><div>The DPDK I am using is 17.05.2</div><div><br=
></div><div>thanks,</div><div>James</div></div>

--00000000000078825105cf395889--