From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C8E643CA6 for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 16:22:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D7640E28; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 16:22:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-oi1-f195.google.com (mail-oi1-f195.google.com [209.85.167.195]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F32C440297 for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 16:22:10 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-oi1-f195.google.com with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3c1e6c32a55so566948b6e.2 for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 08:22:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1710429730; x=1711034530; darn=dpdk.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zFEO6Amw/9puHW+hh3H340bTW0M6XWZi30dFeFgOkKY=; b=WR+0qDK2oYJxrKxymGFkbkSdOQcEzQH9G/jOLoVghPOBsi9MnK+7Y9krz5SQv25Sqm vXYOQJRvdJ62AE9uUg70wdhkj1WCEqsZnm2Z2pWsqVuh1dAKhP6Ks43lYNfPSF6ZSuoh Qlh9aLbWx0OXDoA9u43vFR0BzVSXpHo/9Q648ircwE8G+zO0uz6PmvfkHorujXCdMRT1 uQjdYPM9PWfuCSVNO9Hw+JrCsKsITMdtMrOOQem1KP4rDRomZQZqL9uU9sfErsQTBwIU Gx2m7nq1NU1jLbWXuZlMNX2nsaXoUE+MPjGTahyRfroFFPbCgQ/ZMJaLx3Pe2xesFjIZ RLzg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710429730; x=1711034530; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zFEO6Amw/9puHW+hh3H340bTW0M6XWZi30dFeFgOkKY=; b=gTp95Vswjd3VexFTs6bOLIyMKH7Ebcy9eiiv51HXDn7erkInZmuTUnDlNEOJjXoW5n m1cYAqW7MDP+HQ8jiZyJR3YqENy/F7H3puk91HDlyHlSQTFiRrzTnHR5DFCOdxKgE6J6 sb7Uch89WUtOoiXkvYXYaPrrtgckjz3Uh86EOmga2P9AQUkY49xD4u02k1XYqJwVADUI pGMxOliPcKlwy8q2KYqaORf98Wr7Xkuc9c56j9m3UerHFUTe42H7zTZjrMIzb2xSCOMc p7Fi9SbSbPhOLGi6xDBZjZNz1tgY4tAWfkF0/IywvslT63+gLsBmrhZQ2jxxz6Dlpr3P LVkA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyJbVRzV3nlg6yMYqYqLRh+nafBtf3OztNy6xc7GkRGEc/T4eRh QJNOh7anui8DhwYeCaU9BkHC8gGVbDJCNCue1ydpHzTL8vbgXqggrZWHUX2iEVSTrTagi/8apIS tqHA/hawUnAQDFY5IU3q/PhMwdaAWzhhbpaXiqSs90TyUdCaz X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGuL+5pcERGgHIZWXATpyKQEAen16kYMySFelWKWP0HEGyJE+k9KNdVBZ5/mgQ1bYiQELNkraBLO9W0vB5acW8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:320b:b0:3c2:30ca:253e with SMTP id cb11-20020a056808320b00b003c230ca253emr3038647oib.43.1710429729949; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 08:22:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Eric Christian Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 11:21:58 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Intel E810 (ICE PMD) missing LSC event To: users@dpdk.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000077917d0613a074f4" X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org --00000000000077917d0613a074f4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Regarding this discussion in the dev list: https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@dpdk.org/msg283938.html I was told from Intel Premier Support to ask my question here. We are seeing this E810 link issue where cables are pulled and replaced and link status is missed. When I patch in this suggested workaround to the PMD, the issue goes away. Is this patch safe for delivery to production environments? Or is it better to wait for the firmware update? Thanks. Eric --00000000000077917d0613a074f4 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Regarding this discussion in the dev list:=C2=A0=C2=A0https://ww= w.mail-archive.com/dev@dpdk.org/msg283938.html

I was= told from Intel Premier Support to ask my question here.=C2=A0 We are seei= ng this E810 link issue where cables are pulled and replaced and link statu= s is missed.=C2=A0 When I patch in this suggested workaround to=C2=A0the PM= D, the issue goes away.

Is this patch safe for del= ivery to production environments?=C2=A0 Or is it better to wait for the fir= mware update?

Thanks.

Eric



--00000000000077917d0613a074f4--