From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <shrivastav.shyam@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-wr1-f65.google.com (mail-wr1-f65.google.com
 [209.85.221.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C57452965;
 Sat, 20 Oct 2018 07:23:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-wr1-f65.google.com with SMTP id q7-v6so11579606wrr.8;
 Fri, 19 Oct 2018 22:23:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=kEulja9STVZUfF/UiaSlTNGe85+2YTwHc9wsVdDhknw=;
 b=uBRHxRwol1lNXaCZL477EX4382DdftfFtEI3J+0jIQXYNIBWFOoM0FSDpV9MicERhY
 UCqEbj9XvHfZ6W8V1ynXZmUWsfstxwjmLbaZpm9L9aLdhhIOSce3B29jC/kzInuhI7XY
 ae0q5qE7or6+omQDahSa41jK4nBGxiqUB/NoUAxpOGynUMKappITU257cbtwB6U5eFWN
 yTbg4UFO/Rv+8oDqYktcng0vKvnM1voHhyHZ0SaHLRj9Xtg8ezAyKg0xRZdhWY6wUg+1
 h3ChI9M3aXhwSJsNvAZStDj+RgfX+HUPxAtYByj6Q0Y60lnNeBSnhfdtk5BGyyhaOk6J
 0WQg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=kEulja9STVZUfF/UiaSlTNGe85+2YTwHc9wsVdDhknw=;
 b=NegqXxdHRW0RyRqbZiEFf05rkIYc7QuvoOxi27wQLgxSRz7RCGWJ1GLBqrmcsEXgMz
 bfIwNDVbaQjovXKAUaRahLNx9oe1SbPOTvIbziHLXz8QGrIvmvap7VzPU8XSiqRKfNhP
 wUBvqq3oEkeEFhJmA1agRAqsrRYUGJBKjBipy9s+bLHzIgn4mWIXML7rHSMq8AWs1MAe
 JoGTVUWI10BYpYXFAoe8vn+nSfopPjDjuxvr8RxlmGBLfmkyXyNHkCUgo0JBaAtvY0Gc
 pPhfYy/LX20u5mtzDLjPncEfnsURkgIIbNz9otkTqbjHNQIx6BNhkacPlvAXpiGPvv85
 K+hw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gKpUbHx9mIL3DIWy1siSmcoOrRizvvafmNLPw0OuEO2Vui8h931
 2HsnIfg6zH0HgUpBGWt9ITUCXdGc+L2XxLClXf4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5e6vBwYkZEGrgbT+NUKBmyZh6ILibBoY71LtrkXAwbL3mWg12KGzXH6eNQPsEJC8gWDFtbf9p9HvP2TpE2+aS8=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:dcc4:: with SMTP id x4-v6mr606435wrm.212.1540012987273; 
 Fri, 19 Oct 2018 22:23:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <A69E93D1CF6DFA4BA33FB8D8DAFFFD19035A0280@dggemm512-mbx.china.huawei.com>
 <CAGSp03nOTeCO8xdJ8wbhi+Z2_6kMAyhYYNQvV9BaFS=txFn4dg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGSp03nOTeCO8xdJ8wbhi+Z2_6kMAyhYYNQvV9BaFS=txFn4dg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Shyam Shrivastav <shrivastav.shyam@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2018 10:52:50 +0530
Message-ID: <CAGSp03ncwhn4ZxHtqnMoZEVJYQjc27bcWwVBvhwstpzyJWa67w@mail.gmail.com>
To: lidejun1@huawei.com
Cc: users <users@dpdk.org>, dev@dpdk.org, lichunhe@huawei.com, 
 wangliefeng@huawei.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] [dpdk-dev] IPV4/IPV6 TCP/UDP Pseudo Header
	Checksum APIs
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2018 05:23:08 -0000

Realized my answer is confusing, I meant to say that code is correct as
pseudo ipv4/ipv6 headers for the purpose of checksum calculations doesn't
include options or extension headers, see udp wiki or corresponding rfcs

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_Datagram_Protocol

On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 10:42 AM Shyam Shrivastav <
shrivastav.shyam@gmail.com> wrote:

> that is correct , pseudo header doesn't include ipv4 options or ipv6
> extension headers ..
>
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 9:02 AM lidejun <lidejun1@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>> Has anybody used the following two APIs calculating ipv4&ipv6 tcp/udp
>> pseudo header checksum=EF=BC=9F
>>
>> 1.    rte_ipv4_phdr_cksum
>>
>> 2.    rte_ipv6_phdr_cksum
>> The ipv4 version does not exclude ip options and ipv6 version does not
>> exclude extersion headers.
>>
>