From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <mon120494@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-oi0-f48.google.com (mail-oi0-f48.google.com
 [209.85.218.48]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BE862BF1
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 04:16:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-oi0-f48.google.com with SMTP id f189so7886620oig.3
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 19:16:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=6tGfaFFKGNFQl0G+Q0wZpiQdd6g/DBDK0CuG2XYlNBc=;
 b=J0AIUJhDkDKvm0bdVyVGeEECodeWyp+K6vQzwH56A0PZtkCN7mitrf51yIOQhCY3eS
 Uj/5TlFKKZbCusM8/6xjrIfZ6A24qfX7nTB3wavlX2OPtY0bGnqCF7wQrVnLVdlYJW5p
 y/ReFndHa57vUYsctI4sVLHV1bY6nrtE3arsanqGUv+eTAJyp5qMsZpBUDcbB7SLaL4w
 /H2CPlfPGkX3ZXzcmE5SqgDH85/JEv7SI1ThPtQiYMvOOVWN7XwaXWyaAYaqYRIyYE1T
 KmGyBasixfy6XcPzZu6/NbiO7PeOQF0Tv8lnlDA4QX9JEkJz8dmcThcbjwdDqa+wN1B4
 M5lA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to;
 bh=6tGfaFFKGNFQl0G+Q0wZpiQdd6g/DBDK0CuG2XYlNBc=;
 b=SjKFsBqNeErph6y2mjK9lWMSxDKJoVph5QPW0y2ZsulWSJ3gir+4ibosQQAZ9Zlj68
 uEmwBEDz9/kXO3RG70KAB1Tdb6ssvFYku30meKAXxgqAoiCmOHPhvRhh5OCpzJpAELxM
 iPxlARrkIfvIkWT8NcNun/EaQvZ/aJ0OsGR+vQJrirlRNdy3lLA41RA5IyKGcdJytvXX
 23rWJtrKD9PR0e5abdAwHrbQ7vibxAI4hqoRPJEmiSDRNBLVVX5e2kPr5taB7zweexqG
 NwZ+Y7vZjQ3HljncEUAz+RyS4O4xTBhrNKrRP/OYuXSHkh0oDDmtWz1unPqPEU3jSKxj
 fNuQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNN3qJnaDsDKxStdLBBoynL7UztgfpSB3OV73IwcMZ+IKGCTSxgGJnEdla+aKZPJCjiVhpPyLM2AzvaCw==
X-Received: by 10.157.19.111 with SMTP id q44mr1228559otq.139.1472523404558;
 Mon, 29 Aug 2016 19:16:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.202.106.72 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 19:16:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAHzS=K-VQ3ZBMz=Rmp2PhNM6O9=dY5uwiPXobzpHz7Y-26m0SQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHzS=K_Kiis9m4oKwT9dOsgN0LfoHVspgqp7g5i4Vfify1YXcg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHzS=K-VQ3ZBMz=Rmp2PhNM6O9=dY5uwiPXobzpHz7Y-26m0SQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?xJDhu5cgSG/DoG5n?= <mon120494@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 10:16:44 +0800
Message-ID: <CAHzS=K-=ZwMv7jgj5axreywxkk3mCnNvhMvTzmbvsz_z9AdNoQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: users@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] How to disable flow control?
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 02:16:45 -0000

Here is the Port statistics of l2fwd on my computer, almost half of the
packets are dropped

Port statistics =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Statistics for port 0 ------------------------------
Packets sent:                      124
Packets received:             10000180
Packets dropped:                     0
Statistics for port 1 ------------------------------
Packets sent:                  5875606
Packets received:                  124
Packets dropped:               4124574
Aggregate statistics =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Total packets sent:            5875730
Total packets received:       10000304
Total packets dropped:         4124574
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D


On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:08 AM, =C4=90=E1=BB=97 Ho=C3=A0ng <mon120494@gma=
il.com> wrote:

> I have checked again, FC is disabled by default (I'm running the l2fwd
> example).
> So what's the problem with my NIC speed?
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 9:54 AM, =C4=90=E1=BB=97 Ho=C3=A0ng <mon120494@gm=
ail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I'm running DPDK with a dual-port 82546EB NIC, but the performance is
>> really low (about 150Mbit/s).
>> Somebody told me that I should disable flow control and try again, but I
>> don't know how to do it.
>> So, I have 2 questions:
>> - How to disable flow control?
>> - If the performance doesn't get better after disabling flow control,
>> what should I do next?
>>
>> Any advice and suggestions will be greatly appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks in advance!
>>
>
>