From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <mon120494@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-oi0-f41.google.com (mail-oi0-f41.google.com
 [209.85.218.41]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18A802BF1
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 04:08:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-oi0-f41.google.com with SMTP id j203so7784801oih.2
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 19:08:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=E3E0acDcJAyOIbpxYnd2ega3KzySG6s6/dLB4YmHHX4=;
 b=oTzrtjgP+0+FUrmxySQSO5KCWwBrarSyk251kQasw05KKA0Y92xnqFejhALz2i9PEW
 WXW53Uf/hdO6XK4xWFsncxDOvlr8H2qX9EQh8Y3G7Sn1QuSAo2bTo8mJWtKxXBJ3IfOE
 2mba3CwOjyCUxLTaqPgAyAAaP0xGspOKJcoiIA91bZq1HDI5eg/lyvyBhB1PynpQ7LDn
 LKHvvCJ2LxsHtWBIVpBjcdxInbcOifD+4FXohDiwgERARXqhNW+lOakKMyGV9pYkSV3T
 RX7q3vF+qoDVddnP6CABTg3BAXj0EWPjCwxFZ2b3+LszRqv1zKFy//2CayM49koBVTh3
 A0KA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to;
 bh=E3E0acDcJAyOIbpxYnd2ega3KzySG6s6/dLB4YmHHX4=;
 b=DaPDJSnfalcsET2L4JwDmctRXslEbJ3hDpHNS9zRqVx+DkNAVHDjVUDH4DJy4zOgPL
 MHbsTPgmmu9z/zekvo6It6O7+EBKb7qZhFcNHdtzYjAMzzkKS874AYg8jlQ2SqFZl7Bm
 C1dfhYbz4T/ASuoTFzx+v/Y1coVoe3yGe02cuwZub75xS2F+a5zSkA1eriYYuYd5Apwu
 Ip0SuvJoYBhfYVnaZVxilMxSFnMUYP8eQtlqcUHsCYR8F/3+oZp5xe6jrlDSFTKW7eB+
 xeyutttTEvYw922woYV+Wg8l+d8pL7VN1Xzz4xxgfAGX0mgqarCGUNy4bQRh20T641Yx
 lMew==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwPv+5zkuRFlMHhJFHRwb/3o+MsKNoW0WCpu58Gr+WVliR5TMvAVWcXOsQZueKkX88gtgOJIGbTgqmedrQ==
X-Received: by 10.157.27.227 with SMTP id v32mr1185367otv.12.1472522915328;
 Mon, 29 Aug 2016 19:08:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.202.106.72 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 19:08:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAHzS=K_Kiis9m4oKwT9dOsgN0LfoHVspgqp7g5i4Vfify1YXcg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHzS=K_Kiis9m4oKwT9dOsgN0LfoHVspgqp7g5i4Vfify1YXcg@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?xJDhu5cgSG/DoG5n?= <mon120494@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 10:08:34 +0800
Message-ID: <CAHzS=K-VQ3ZBMz=Rmp2PhNM6O9=dY5uwiPXobzpHz7Y-26m0SQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: users@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] How to disable flow control?
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 02:08:36 -0000

I have checked again, FC is disabled by default (I'm running the l2fwd
example).
So what's the problem with my NIC speed?

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 9:54 AM, =C4=90=E1=BB=97 Ho=C3=A0ng <mon120494@gmai=
l.com> wrote:

> Hi there,
>
> I'm running DPDK with a dual-port 82546EB NIC, but the performance is
> really low (about 150Mbit/s).
> Somebody told me that I should disable flow control and try again, but I
> don't know how to do it.
> So, I have 2 questions:
> - How to disable flow control?
> - If the performance doesn't get better after disabling flow control, wha=
t
> should I do next?
>
> Any advice and suggestions will be greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks in advance!
>