From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <mon120494@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-oi0-f46.google.com (mail-oi0-f46.google.com
 [209.85.218.46]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 454A568DD
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 02:53:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-oi0-f46.google.com with SMTP id l203so44997369oib.1
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 17:53:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=Fa1tYzKCSB97WFQWx8oRaoO60sqHmuahAGXhWEjbiUY=;
 b=xHa1TEGlmtvzwO84EVfT7d44LJcV1sT5uCJqSZcprl9H24+FpaX7Ex/dN6envZzOXd
 8DY7raa2O0dghMg/W2e2uV4AtrNixVK1aaOLiYaqcXzTXOuAYVhd6ekcPPdmMFX7k7p5
 1oQqCfn8oHxSJ5EJk5MjkI7l2pL8mZoc3aei4ZIE1L7t8aip08daUG6WXfVMp/uOmzt4
 3bqYvgvO07F63Kwjh/LAkiFIWaIs0j/ks513Edj+Oboof1fwXS+6AKQo8SCnrag1d3Nv
 LYLebhOVdH10B3fy6ScVtcnGNV1rxRDH2vuSgTy6JZhMwM3L8DxqC7VJga/BhOMarKnK
 SzvQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=Fa1tYzKCSB97WFQWx8oRaoO60sqHmuahAGXhWEjbiUY=;
 b=dK+w9fYaEtN+q4sYOoljHA8FZ4O6HaFtAU6ZSWkn6H50LHgQZkToAUf/k2X009AHPM
 MxtyjG/ah5VDr9oNfzyGf+7aNIP98E/RRoo7RwcUfD9UJo7C9lCfz2stYYbnJNPWdllv
 r1YfLOpI5mN4uzACEOCeZyCIoX6XPEPZZYIwJilhdXCEkgXSFc6ok3vqsMlVtnTiolRw
 Og6ydhC7adZIqPRvxcp7OxRWPsceSsHbljlAdky3/UxzL9LSx2ekYA6BxrpbLzslml7L
 hr5serPHDgi4Ud9gz419IZFm94Ixr6fx1FApNLGzTcIsgFALDnsGWqpP5YeFI26elcqj
 l2Tg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouug/52lJZrOSkSDNFnlpNeqhG5GqwKBF/HDLlCicf3IlTAcWG1bxr9VjPxGzgk33CmuKbxGm2dnudtPoA==
X-Received: by 10.157.52.180 with SMTP id g49mr3208083otc.195.1471567993402;
 Thu, 18 Aug 2016 17:53:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.202.106.72 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 17:53:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.202.106.72 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 17:53:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: =?UTF-8?B?xJDhu5cgSG/DoG5n?= <mon120494@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 08:53:12 +0800
Message-ID: <CAHzS=K9yU2e_EZAR3ZyH0XvP0LpQBua=qDYBZSm=j3Hy8LA-SQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: users@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-users] Performance issue with 82546EB NICs
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:53:14 -0000

Hi all,

I am using a dual-port Intel 82546EB to run the simple l2fwd application
(forward 64byte packets).

The result is terrible. My packet generator generates and sends about
320Mb/s, but nearly a half of them are dropped, and only about 160Mb of
packets are forwarded every sec.

I have also tried to run dpdk-pktgen with this NIC and It can only generate
and send about 150Mb/s.

My NIC link speed is 1000Mb/s. I am wondering why its performance is so
slow like this.

Please help me. Any ideas/advices are appreciated.

Thanks.