From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3110DA0C47 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 15:07:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB54D41262; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 15:07:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C3DD4120E for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 15:07:38 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1625576857; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Vo5KPAu/7u+1K0BXbReaaqmR1x3aU/HUoEzorBqFDnQ=; b=QRVlen1bt1BO3MKBSI0p5PNEtDUl6jeaCdouF7C6DAMTfG2Nxx3fePjdK3H58NaJXzMk6a APY0syhcs0Wpg/P6wkAqmGbioYNNMyyMco6NoItoaSoULOYDJRPstje9ZJnr2zTtIC6QCq 07BllnWFEOzbOe5iYbdSvNgDZJrSAdQ= Received: from mail-ua1-f70.google.com (mail-ua1-f70.google.com [209.85.222.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-90-oJIA8y_zOi61XgS_cN6vyg-1; Tue, 06 Jul 2021 09:07:34 -0400 X-MC-Unique: oJIA8y_zOi61XgS_cN6vyg-1 Received: by mail-ua1-f70.google.com with SMTP id c24-20020ab069580000b0290294f1e254c0so7493004uas.21 for ; Tue, 06 Jul 2021 06:07:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Vo5KPAu/7u+1K0BXbReaaqmR1x3aU/HUoEzorBqFDnQ=; b=i4jfOERmpgZFX7smDX3eEjVCo1C08aDn+YZpAvR/WQkTl0uAkyItwMJiPMwm/5xmmg ME/3Sd4sssf+BfBx7hwFs/iQOfhP/RQHRsng8GL8lLYbt5jDBVZDq7Ukd1koeMXQ29Uz g/rlbWfiKa1xHHRxsIr74hyFeBgOUqM38rTboTalJ6dusqm9fcITZNN5rx+czqneEU+i hmOummfjX7R3lUIoerAVn4le10QhNrOY2xV08W0g/EMaaZR5OkAlCqhkgViroPmXenrX +iSKeUZ6CyaW1LE0eYC4jASrApF2NPW73DR4UU6u6xxSwKNzsEG/7uK88Lhjn4iT0zES cZ4g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533iKAkN+IELSoOiO5DLqlReGN514+3D+Gy6NxpVSw/xWLD6uxo+ ZcidkPjKnEyNxGYc0sLJjfIZhm/FwHhwUfpeRW+ufN+5i/cNSqY+VzmoN43GoJTyp0OunPFVris 6m8KygQcWkCoMLhRw4Rb3aA== X-Received: by 2002:a67:f3d1:: with SMTP id j17mr7504789vsn.18.1625576854323; Tue, 06 Jul 2021 06:07:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxGgQ+TAUqhgtPBrvkmqK9Tk9Lw7Jn06j15PM6eNE0883bulFB7oc9oGH1V9XOAMr1FQDTDQtAIlMSw/1qDTBc= X-Received: by 2002:a67:f3d1:: with SMTP id j17mr7504739vsn.18.1625576853956; Tue, 06 Jul 2021 06:07:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 15:07:22 +0200 Message-ID: To: Ashish Mishra Cc: users Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Installation of latest DPDK on x86_64 machine X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "users" On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 2:26 PM Ashish Mishra wrote: > > Hi Members , > > I am trying to get DPDK installed on x86_64 mahine by following below > steps > git clone https://dpdk.org/git/dpdk > cd dpdk/ > meson -Dexamples=all build > cd build > ninja > ninja install > > a) Any input where should in find "igb_uio.ko" > > b) Even i tried modprobe igb_uio.ko , it didn't helped as i dont see > /usr/local/lib64/dpdk/drivers folder but i can see > /usr/local/lib64/dpdk/pmds-21.3/librte_* > > c) Basically , i wanted to install latest DPDK on my laptop and run an > testpmd > Is there any document where we can find the step's to build and run > testpmd > for the latest version of DPDK > > I am new to DPDK , hence will be helpful if community can share some > pointers Please, prefer vfio-pci over igb_uio. https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/linux_gsg/linux_drivers.html#vfio If you don't have an IOMMU in your system (like you are simply testing dpdk, or running dpdk in a virtual machine with no vIOMMU), you can use the noiommu mode, but keep note that it is less secure. https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/linux_gsg/linux_drivers.html#vfio-no-iommu-mode -- David Marchand