From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93E76A034F for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 17:00:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27C5822A285; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 17:00:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 397A9407FF for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 17:00:40 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1614355239; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qE0BSHzRW5JANI4//MIctWP5lqk32Jn+37Bgmo/tXVM=; b=gn+GidRT0aJUjznFYFe1tBUobv+tWdZx2fNbkxFuteixo6d2aIvY4r6gID8QgrynmVTmUL p48lMAS/J8c+hpk1l5XK7+AzYpHNiUyIXv2xl8YPzQijVt9Dyj38IaTLLGEf2JZ9egF94Y KQ7pgQvlVEbsW567Caq6arLvgy7MiJQ= Received: from mail-vk1-f199.google.com (mail-vk1-f199.google.com [209.85.221.199]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-217-1ncb_RP8OkKh0zKS0w6mjw-1; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 11:00:37 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 1ncb_RP8OkKh0zKS0w6mjw-1 Received: by mail-vk1-f199.google.com with SMTP id p83so2124766vkd.13 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 08:00:32 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qE0BSHzRW5JANI4//MIctWP5lqk32Jn+37Bgmo/tXVM=; b=KPBBbs7AdOjN62A5JHSU2UOuXoqOntdGm0VRViXPjHvURwU7tfJGdJpF7+TPC2cJSd cCkuxXvmu0XdZ7ctSLqquhcTEijT1dYsBhqIPcy51ktjeytIFBc2FJ/O+nu/5SBxK9zJ N2LScE9zrVpjlc/W1z7zVe6TMVfiqob14zem+lqDrh+neikOJOM1/JWjhIuKffitpgev s8b9C+WUY49n2vNPJEL9rofxndWtU74cpdWKjq61hQr08w7XVBZuJe1kQFwPKBciLx7N WGQCinQ9VJ7yo+LhYiXRUfYFzWMQh6/KRM9pYmRAzhA+mCGXq0XqBPyb01hWRoCxvUL/ jawg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532wGkKYJ+g0dhPMaHeGnCwF4/MJ1zwx1cv+4DnbZfFl4etl4R4l g1K8tzb+pM1WfP/c06pnJqvA04OdeYfqC7xdXNrrzKmTlmdtewF+GU9fgoLuSmmNf1uQAUHBN50 KDKU06f+RYxG1t+hl5zxfAQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1f:6e0f:: with SMTP id j15mr1960671vkc.18.1614355232148; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 08:00:32 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyJ0PThrrzvf0ip+i14DuefuIFZ57vX7S01dTN7/VWUHBgU72fWQ+UReqb6ARlW9TpnrOMRcXXglRdRRpx6UrI= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:6e0f:: with SMTP id j15mr1960665vkc.18.1614355231992; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 08:00:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 17:00:21 +0100 Message-ID: To: Li Feng , James Huang Cc: users Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] DPDK program huge core file size X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "users" On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 5:00 AM Li Feng wrote: > > I think you should update your dpdk to the latest. > I have fixed this issue some months ago. > > d72e4042c - mem: exclude unused memory from core dump No need to go to the latest release, this commit has been backported to 19.11 recently. http://git.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/commit/?h=19.11&id=d3ceba92eff783d2c995387e5ed8509045578748 You can wait for the next 19.11.x release. -- David Marchand