* Intel 800/700 series support for RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_SEND_ON_TIMESTAMP?
@ 2025-03-22 4:36 Trey Harrison
2025-03-24 7:33 ` David Marchand
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Trey Harrison @ 2025-03-22 4:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: users
It seems that there is no support for
RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_SEND_ON_TIMESTAMP on Intel's 700/800 series chips
in any DPDK release (although, there is support for the 225/226
chips). I have done as thorough of a search on this as I can, but
wanted to reach out to actual devs before giving up.
I guess I am hoping to simply confirm, from anyone with knowledge of
the subject, that there is in fact no such support in any forthcoming
patches / DPDK releases / driver revisions / etc.
It would also be interesting to know whether the hardware is even
capable of this feature - if so, maybe it would not be too complicated
to implement it? Especially since there is an example in net/igc to
work from..
Thanks!
Trey
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Intel 800/700 series support for RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_SEND_ON_TIMESTAMP?
2025-03-22 4:36 Intel 800/700 series support for RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_SEND_ON_TIMESTAMP? Trey Harrison
@ 2025-03-24 7:33 ` David Marchand
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Marchand @ 2025-03-24 7:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Trey Harrison, Bruce Richardson, Burakov, Anatoly,
Vladimir Medvedkin, Ian Stokes
Cc: users
On Sat, Mar 22, 2025 at 5:37 AM Trey Harrison
<harrisondigitalmedia@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It seems that there is no support for
> RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_SEND_ON_TIMESTAMP on Intel's 700/800 series chips
> in any DPDK release (although, there is support for the 225/226
> chips). I have done as thorough of a search on this as I can, but
> wanted to reach out to actual devs before giving up.
>
> I guess I am hoping to simply confirm, from anyone with knowledge of
> the subject, that there is in fact no such support in any forthcoming
> patches / DPDK releases / driver revisions / etc.
>
> It would also be interesting to know whether the hardware is even
> capable of this feature - if so, maybe it would not be too complicated
> to implement it? Especially since there is an example in net/igc to
> work from..
Adding Intel maintainers in the loop.
--
David Marchand
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-03-24 7:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-03-22 4:36 Intel 800/700 series support for RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_SEND_ON_TIMESTAMP? Trey Harrison
2025-03-24 7:33 ` David Marchand
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).