From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DD73459DD for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2024 09:26:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B90AA43353; Fri, 20 Sep 2024 09:26:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47E3840669 for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2024 09:26:21 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1726817180; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=pwacl6raLb6c1v7H6irr6mkdNjOAI3hzMQDsXsnQlsM=; b=Rqc8R2ssVA8mRPta5XGInHBV+VeXQctP2bSyiwbmgvu3dYUnIZu6p8P/0bM8zVokGTqWEj klRsPyyll7i0k9DE/Jfyy0MBoQ2UKTuruagYLxLGSsUomrLVjPLPN76qGb1IeqZT3gGcbP Q/9Yhy4p4gc1nWhNjfG2hZ4INWYOeYM= Received: from mail-lf1-f72.google.com (mail-lf1-f72.google.com [209.85.167.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-515-pn2NWT31MXaC9NkMC8fsXQ-1; Fri, 20 Sep 2024 03:26:19 -0400 X-MC-Unique: pn2NWT31MXaC9NkMC8fsXQ-1 Received: by mail-lf1-f72.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-536589936d3so1541415e87.0 for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:26:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1726817178; x=1727421978; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=pwacl6raLb6c1v7H6irr6mkdNjOAI3hzMQDsXsnQlsM=; b=mJCQFUfdSIo124qxkHq+6IH0rl6vSkpoaVRj2wIx8gNXv2rfA30Xq3C88RKmmBggOO wkBRO6Fi/awMFV7/giUUf246PjaeccopxHMd9CGJcaKE3SR7TPrzZCzgiBq0M4YWJZrx zsryDlRVWcbX62DaOetXx+gIOdUCEQkG0puccuJ0z5K+xsj3CQvIcr3ZF+Pkb2qQk/v8 SAVFWo6p8XXE+t+ScdnGerO8jeiWXq5yTdOsZbNHwDjFZaXEBdUCNxLxkxE0R654NQ+g x7cw9OWMkqsqkUj7xC9mvHIYJ7qUcNOy6SXIHRKl2S3ATeniw2aN1pwXgcKJtM535J0I mvPw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWmqqGOiYYCAH+TeMO9cXkU60QYpVBvK7s8xH1GwVYtpEZq+y+ZBbe7svazgz3A6s8B0Mol7w==@dpdk.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxXhHy0k//vIFgqDEfEJHpcJ/tcY8s2r3Vsnm0kgE/aRwIyuNN8 AJ6uMQBBT4CNdTPnOoPdlVdMeWfE81nZyha+Lwr3U8CB/1nCA5C/jVhgS0DaJTF+ZSXuQj+COFn prIfTlHQYSh+wUgLpKLil3lSqkvFQx8O4s1OhysaUQ8jPRG5rkz9iRyuYYjjQWKHXbZO1ZF94xQ ByP8hDEfEgV71ApV9TIg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:1192:b0:535:6cf6:92f7 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-536ac338d1fmr988398e87.59.1726817177747; Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:26:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHFvPLM4/k8RADVMF5O+yMmQhcLiYwgdbInyTiQD7KBGWWQnE3qaUTpuK7mCZkB1BrV72YcbXYm+OLdv4PS7FI= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:1192:b0:535:6cf6:92f7 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-536ac338d1fmr988385e87.59.1726817177388; Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:26:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20240919152148.45a19343@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: <20240919152148.45a19343@hermes.local> From: David Marchand Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 09:26:05 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Accuracy of rte_get_tsc_hz() compared to linux To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: Isaac Boukris , users@dpdk.org X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 12:22=E2=80=AFAM Stephen Hemminger wrote: > Sigh. exposing tsc frequency through sysfs is a Redhat extension > that never got merged upstream. Counter sight :-). Not sure where this assertion comes from. I see no trace of this downstream: RH policy is "upstream first". --=20 David Marchand