From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E85DA0353 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 15:49:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 529061C044; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 15:49:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-il1-f181.google.com (mail-il1-f181.google.com [209.85.166.181]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 357321C043 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 15:49:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-il1-f181.google.com with SMTP id p16so29683592ile.0 for ; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 06:49:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=1562H2j1xHiao9Cf1rChO/ivnMdDmO5KLpceMnOv0I0=; b=j8KTwWcLMZdP1LpkBOY4WfVCf9Y3cKt9u3eqgsudKsCPiIecM5LlhiR0aNQHBP48nI 2mD9uD4VKalfUZlE4ECY+oXhgTnJAWcyzpIx+4cH3XGcjsuJs+VTNsBm/eNLZCxWnR5G h4P03xLLzpSYxfM4HEtiBOtgDkMFejj8WtiPjLdvOY7LqvJKTXnbpTMjAQJ1WqJzRizn 14pUr6AhczN2S0XSxCSumw4RYdaGEl603xNFv21g5/Nlh9QHBGR4q6KAGQF8x7HlLtPF iryM/46r/BO+XkC1mGHUuZ5Nh59Agtn8JHr4OT/eXmRliqVD1tlVCGv9qfCHaz4PdoVo zG6Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1562H2j1xHiao9Cf1rChO/ivnMdDmO5KLpceMnOv0I0=; b=igWUhyrM/hLzMbnUMq9kkz5PweI5XSciNb3EsXp8A2bcaDnh3QNOkBaneMuv0CB2vD aOBroO6tac9lLz5qJ+CxFvi/LFztYG22vrNTKOPQhhGIK/SxmkD9nFUeE+ZR6pVV/ZTT ZO08UpZpOTPdMSRVVAOzI2LrzEY5wyHIKTYyidYkextqDprghWIu8afCObvKUYRFu2CR P/kUuYgdETZJhGBDrTURu85qITNdBYsavY0nbMq93LOgbji2R7qJnuJIhGTJiCsm8egg IRGQPdggI9zczhNz26AsndxU9SQ790D8VlTPxBTpo8JdnoHov1xLtmv5hIQnYIRBdncN ZZYA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532NwPLufMIbUlmIE06dxqu2//ZBceCRwQ+wtbaxs/TgOqcsFR22 dXjVtjGyP0kCcMl6zBhh6qucddQJcEwSFFRhw1RAupDSOX8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJygUzrLb4xOJHpMhXKPkESYsOjxZP/jmGC2Cuv4TK4/8huE/lB6ewXm7VyWz/aP1VXztZWZMiSk1pZbisCtFA8= X-Received: by 2002:a92:b112:: with SMTP id t18mr10578455ilh.172.1596721771230; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 06:49:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200805110031.5d5604cc@hermes.lan> In-Reply-To: <20200805110031.5d5604cc@hermes.lan> From: David Aldrich Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2020 14:49:20 +0100 Message-ID: To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: users Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] How to receive jumbo packets? X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "users" Hi Stephen > Did you configure larger mtu and enable jumbo in the rx_conf? No, I hadn't done that. Working now. Thanks! David On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 7:00 PM Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 18:38:01 +0100 > David Aldrich wrote: > > > Hi > > > > Our dpdk application uses dpdk-stable-18.11.9. It successfully receives > udp > > packets <1500 octets, but does not correctly process larger udp packets. > > > > I don't know where to look. Is there a DPDK function that sets or takes > the > > MTU size for reception? > > > > How would jumbo packets typically be supported on the Rx side? > > > > Best regards > > David > > Did you configure larger mtu and enable jumbo in the rx_conf? >