From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF355456E2 for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2024 13:02:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AEFD40261; Mon, 29 Jul 2024 13:02:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-oo1-f52.google.com (mail-oo1-f52.google.com [209.85.161.52]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 961BA4021D for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2024 13:02:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-oo1-f52.google.com with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-5d5e97b8a22so586767eaf.2 for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2024 04:02:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1722250954; x=1722855754; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=SKM+18wQn5iJcLF1QQu+hJsgZ0uajypfQlmU9dcx9R4=; b=JniLFfwyEOL7SGSwr+OAVvAtyDcVf6Pj9o/oZpWw8uzT23NNvVSgMEf3AGElskoXA0 YunP+6RkejgVxPOClyWqb9oTx2uvgPOXeRfaHko8Hkpf3Qpnu3+GM9qqh5nFZQnMNaJf WVb8ZlswczMZzZ+YRzUY6YZw3z/RMbHrn1QTII7x0+yDKtQ7BFMj9Uwp8oTG6K287pIM 3UamzJQ0Fp667JT0icPPE1uA9Qs9c4v4JFrcASpp4K5OgbzpuCGcVKKZ2ie45rEqBemB WZfaiBITPZcNWhyrTPbS51KFhbGjf5wk/drj8bFHtnKlD7ayXMcpHQdFxgFqipHd5F3w de9w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1722250954; x=1722855754; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=SKM+18wQn5iJcLF1QQu+hJsgZ0uajypfQlmU9dcx9R4=; b=PVyjUHpgGQlUuocZ8fYVianU5Pn5qMvDDurymYC8SY3XZTuwjUerQX+XjtuzaE+Lx1 j4QOgADbytqWpTe3kVRer4+uyyXuwRpbw5lG6VFyNKKnoKUakUeo2nWGWEy94Y5mx8a9 c7iVopJRmDYSgdL1xlwyFOty4zYA845W7B/spdfbqSGCUyYXGMDQsQtxNZtznwkOXrRc eATNL63g0ODQx5jSGyvs5ByeV1OS3UhsH1e+gUbzT2UoBTIWsds09wTUOqmqT7R66ZB2 XhgrtYWpsCXlY8CiPRs/REurYYw6YnMfy7UhAgvRLpBdh9g+uh8GuJfcdWufSrY4UxSK ckWw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyXeP4TtXtGqis++CS9IpZ+nJElwFAHy2HPTpmuEpqTmFumvw8b 1yxaZ7gmjXo+JeY/tmRa8uCWOXTiDiCA1UuUC0yldb9SpGZQBQQM1zKTzpaJPcaHqTzcdN5ww5Y 6YYYU2a25LXCUMeT6labavBR0+OE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFlM66SujQPGPDcCGwptJOvhBImmFIPvYPLdWphWICpcvpNijCfyWc9SEi/6/Oqd5uR50+JFjIGwtTi8sXmtes= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6820:270b:b0:5d5:c805:acae with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-5d5d0ecc2a1mr6644657eaf.5.1722250953615; Mon, 29 Jul 2024 04:02:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20240726103018.760819a9@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: <20240726103018.760819a9@hermes.local> From: David Aldrich Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 12:02:22 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Unable to build igb_uio To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: users Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Hi Stephen and Oleksandr Thanks for your replies. I guess the documentation I'm looking at is out-of-date, but the Broadcom app note I'm looking at suggests testing with testpmd, but first binding with: usertools/dpdk-devbind.py -b igb_uio Given igb_uio is deprecated, is this binding step still required and, if so, what parameters are now required? Best regards David On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 6:30=E2=80=AFPM Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 16:04:07 +0100 > David Aldrich wrote: > > > Hi > > I am using DPDK 23.11.1. I need to build and install linux kernel > > module igb_uio. > > Are you sure? igb_uio has been deprecated in favor of vfio_pci. > Unless you are on a really old kernel, there is no longer a need for igb_= uio.