From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A309A45940 for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 00:35:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CACC402A8; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 00:35:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pf1-f182.google.com (mail-pf1-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7BE44026A for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 00:35:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pf1-f182.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-717911ef035so2854153b3a.3 for ; Sun, 08 Sep 2024 15:35:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1725834908; x=1726439708; darn=dpdk.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=YrSCl84jMNsRx473XsKez2s6devJ7Ajtf8eLBhRj3/4=; b=DkW2awknrRxRUBg+Pgd5xzGh6S+IjWsK1cUdz6Pb68buckBgUapvcu8/h6dHFGZeO+ Nc/k2EAD6U+MMf9WIvQjhaBQ+CSmBxlWpDiv2auChVGkmGGbEoLKq/sBL3gfVkV33N65 4tG45tq17cpYeU1AammmmirNi5tWtnhkTGUhq/OUuup6TYd8oHTWTWHXI0gH7gLw9JSx QS16+hsprOEKPNE38WE4KSwuHN7S82S+TiYTM+c4Xqa03zZcGN+204Dkt7skNyO1uZWA qIG5xSRaQ1WMcrsdiEs6U1/S0GDrFDpGNxzhWTGjxhNjuJg3PTs3dZAg873gyVy7Kgak FnWQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1725834908; x=1726439708; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=YrSCl84jMNsRx473XsKez2s6devJ7Ajtf8eLBhRj3/4=; b=fnszAabYT2oZhf+4lmGm7x5QfkBLXSsFnXIwketZ5/JLJDm/hO8Ckr3sBlWcW2EXhp 4W4CuGCEQdExXGvn8PVGUH6x5K9PR9vQpVpIy1SG3fBG8I5bWBTqlA5LdE280hmMS1h8 eWEq+tanIgsBqaAJw/6tk+njsWGTjwKjP8cydBXZDTDyk9MBkRTSgtdhDs3M9P9QQXOx p9nCYiULmXP3IHDQpohU4FVpUPvTOzudmpryJ860g4CefvodnxRLU6ZlnPLWBDqmQlXk ekpFZvSiRt30DQQx9O4Cbb6WHp0vbL81DQhWaAsO9Yfbg1ykg/4lpqINcT42nsmGLEN8 hE0w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyVa2wLEpMviJ9NeJyqbph56DQTVL6hGU+TaBl3mRDIiRYOBmyP CSYM+ebhmqWwXe1YiQmBU8+Jb0vi/upDgAZt4H/SLtyzkTGH7maOVHRJj5YAmLb19XFeK1P2f1Q M12AdHTGKRGl+9DjZaiRlViN73vD5jA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG9klESZF4LVGyxvbsSFyoioU13bnDOPkSV0O2FlSTPInp1a+UpYVw8WZMvCGYvpwKahR8lKohZ4frUWAVbX4U= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:cfa4:b0:1ce:f0cc:e0dc with SMTP id adf61e73a8af0-1cf1d05a937mr9235723637.4.1725834907731; Sun, 08 Sep 2024 15:35:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Dpdk Newbie Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2024 23:34:56 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Does DPDK provide RX timestamps? To: users@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Hi. I am using Intel (i210) and AWS ENA network interface cards. I would like to measure the following RX latencies: 1) NIC to DPDK packet ring buffer 2) DPDK packet ring buffer to application via rte_eth_rx_burst. I don't mind measuring in nanoseconds or CPU cycles. Unfortunately I cannot find any mention of hardware timestamps. I found brief references to mbuf containing a timestamp in the dynamic fields, but nothing definitive. Could someone please clarify what the situation is? Thanks,