From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A11542917 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 07:22:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EFE240DFD; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 07:22:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-qk1-f177.google.com (mail-qk1-f177.google.com [209.85.222.177]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28E8640A8B for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 07:22:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-qk1-f177.google.com with SMTP id u4so10577370qkp.11 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 22:22:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1681190524; x=1683782524; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=o2urlEgxQi2lvD3dgmhnGHdkd9NnsvseVp0/K9akU1s=; b=WvqogjIyMcMLHTOVfw1anHlqB6Daei2m/bGgKX2PuEUl6uYiRZqQ14xZXMIpgM40fy dVOEn8wRFEBPzaYZBL/ozQDCjEXOp5GPVeuvooUZVlHAwhuV5kbq9fPhgwu85iHFF3II RVUzSVCJE2GXzC0MT1/lQK/qWftLwdl8AQ/8z3rwW8Rl/V82xIAbB2SwlTK8xA+yMeg0 X8JuwvwBX7BwLOuOiDjdoSWNuyJxwJryjXZ9d2FuOo95pjcmqrth3+kPQEdX1rt+4+Kn wCYwDYcoFqMFqDn8gCPtXbxMwDX/upKXZRWyJ9U8msIZ2ShQzuoqMWZ4IPwsRgKMpYMg EsBQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1681190524; x=1683782524; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=o2urlEgxQi2lvD3dgmhnGHdkd9NnsvseVp0/K9akU1s=; b=BDlnwBUkBEUz6ygBM170LmDfLBCFTiS0Mb58a80XmfGm3f38eqEAPjOVnROlkWvOfa BqBLTBNztv47+7lo16oMdds3uK7w2gn5nbIejCkZ9h8vHqeKxrer0cjzaa8QylKUUwKE kqhQm/RbSbjrGAShuRhxoIzMLn7I9HPkryF59IIv6jHm4rR1rjoiIcMNHlSBxhntIQFC OYBM7BszHTmkmDI7mRIDroqRC/mDFZSOAeaRSW5bDKDX9QFoaKuJONsjY7dqf7Ejb7XO UgaT/PGOgiUJhxT4KW5dZKblS+Bw7auIi098nO9OEql3Y8SaC2dexreTyhHPl6/jy2c3 fnBg== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9cwy5cg1KsawIgaDVfAnCcBv/xhxNEyeHM46+BC7VSdqBlAagf3 lt3KIrXXBtI/fGs8Ctzfib5nfFXQPVV+VeGB3xM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350bVltV7yL8dOc6YUF9LaaQ4gsEdNlYwwhrPeOmx/nvdt4I1bvGIhOyd4lVgeKYwkOY7jYkjx547ylnN1zpKR80= X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1981:b0:745:6b06:8a0c with SMTP id bm1-20020a05620a198100b007456b068a0cmr4313200qkb.1.1681190524527; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 22:22:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230410103057.74121cc5@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: <20230410103057.74121cc5@hermes.local> From: Pavel Vazharov Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 08:21:53 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: DPDK and full TCP-IP stack To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: fwefew 4t4tg <7532yahoo@gmail.com>, users@dpdk.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000003ac2905f908ac24" X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org --00000000000003ac2905f908ac24 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable There is also F-stack which is basically the FreeBSD networking stack over DPDK. On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 8:31=E2=80=AFPM Stephen Hemminger < stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote: > On Mon, 10 Apr 2023 13:08:15 -0400 > fwefew 4t4tg <7532yahoo@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65841190/does-dpdk-provide-a-native-t= cp-ip-network-stack-implemetation > > > > points out there's no native TCP-IP in DPDK stack until v20.11. We're a= t > > 23.03. Was this completed? > > No. > There was never a full TCP-IP stack in DPDK. > Doing one correctly, and supporting it, is a difficult effort. > There are many one off projects doing TCP over DPDK. > And FD.IO has a TCP host stack > https://fd.io/docs/vpp/v2101/whatisvpp/hoststack.html > --00000000000003ac2905f908ac24 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
There is also F-stack which is basically the FreeBSD networking stack over DPDK.

On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 8:31=E2=80=AFPM Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote= :
On Mon, 10 Apr= 2023 13:08:15 -0400
fwefew 4t4tg <7= 532yahoo@gmail.com> wrote:

> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65841190/does-dpdk-provide-= a-native-tcp-ip-network-stack-implemetation
>
> points out there's no native TCP-IP in DPDK stack until v20.11. We= 're at
> 23.03. Was this completed?

No.
There was never a full TCP-IP stack in DPDK.
Doing one correctly, and supporting it, is a difficult effort.
There are many one off projects doing TCP over DPDK.
And FD.IO= has a TCP host stack https://fd.io/docs/vpp/v2= 101/whatisvpp/hoststack.html
--00000000000003ac2905f908ac24--