From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9B1642911 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 19:08:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1087740DDC; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 19:08:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-yb1-f181.google.com (mail-yb1-f181.google.com [209.85.219.181]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E99DA40A81 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 19:08:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-yb1-f181.google.com with SMTP id q5so8131068ybk.7 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 10:08:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1681146531; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=2WV6nV5T2xm40wEIspL9J4uX9NJRZ7ReJYtsYF99SQg=; b=T/2YA6lWYD2IdGpAG4V934nbkfdyfOaibT4cHwLK7zJ2UN0pIoBwA9fFOugLquiK5Y 2HlfxYMo0D+r/qPlwPqnWCwtRu2o92bsfLL/MHXSJwVh8PP2eENS7jWN9Pe8x9npMP6v 0qhN6xRJoJkToA/6gsPiv/+GElrx4ieslXHdY7hYrozSkIqA7awcpW3VRaXSksOJjrqI 3cz9DVEuHDBXQsuZlFxT/S9oE+2+tSAMuo4KIeVIxV0gJAE8PxtZd1lXF1gz/3LRpB/e FLUW6EeFzR/wW64ZN7iwnt5+0CQxD94u4IP/JfSrgPD6aaJLUIlqZmHDOsShEMy+HyDQ FU2A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1681146531; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=2WV6nV5T2xm40wEIspL9J4uX9NJRZ7ReJYtsYF99SQg=; b=QYf/r58p9Dlmpdcr2YudqqqMuY4Hz1/t+yh5lCZ7Rxtjn0GiJ/L7LyFvC4dnPvNiIp tU12QPk2wdEngKBw4pZ8mewcf0UL7YuNsQi1ipvbge7YsICAUR8Ppg6/T1NVhsCwttAV Skfai8LvDbkbxBTaD+T0jDEk6zobiHPRfdFJxfsFp6kjc2qFEQsVN2TWzOlX37oKj14t 9pScJ45dVIzkHfeJ/8IcuOm7dLB33S5+XmT7QiwZlRd/9N+Gq2j+FGmL2gy4Ra6Sf41J qvjxTZzjtbQQA5SoL2frbUMbaTnYD09YD+2BYDMYuO/hU6Ys/nBgnV7481uA3tQahlpE A+Xg== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9dCmmpdGf1HqHuepVTEUcrW7soJSuLcVWvNKfuYsy9GnuzcSm3B 2/ozJbua4y2CmFvabovckW4h64AoL2RukfjRWFng5zvm+Ow= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350ZduQhKY5Mq2uizJEIXUMB7GJ2c96uNGQ7h55hUfEi7svdEuIvNAfuaf6+DZrXGLQ6+2g1GqX1W6XiwE16VO58= X-Received: by 2002:a25:d650:0:b0:b8e:efd8:f2c with SMTP id n77-20020a25d650000000b00b8eefd80f2cmr2645586ybg.1.1681146530876; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 10:08:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: fwefew 4t4tg <7532yahoo@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 13:08:15 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: DPDK and full TCP-IP stack To: users@dpdk.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c9d36305f8fe6df1" X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org --000000000000c9d36305f8fe6df1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65841190/does-dpdk-provide-a-native-tcp-ip-network-stack-implemetation points out there's no native TCP-IP in DPDK stack until v20.11. We're at 23.03. Was this completed? --000000000000c9d36305f8fe6df1 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
https://stackoverflow.com/qu= estions/65841190/does-dpdk-provide-a-native-tcp-ip-network-stack-implemetat= ion

points out there's no native TCP-IP in DPDK stack until = v20.11. We're at 23.03. Was this completed?
--000000000000c9d36305f8fe6df1-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ED2742911 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 19:31:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90ED840DDC; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 19:31:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pj1-f52.google.com (mail-pj1-f52.google.com [209.85.216.52]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E7E740A81 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 19:31:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pj1-f52.google.com with SMTP id c3so6024895pjg.1 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 10:31:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; t=1681147859; x=1683739859; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=B5x1nkhHIb5oAJcpGYSkIAALPpFDbQ+/jjVSoi6y14I=; b=XefYyqEmzRclp6BNOi8vtFJhdh3xdFP4MAszwG/tYxFcc6y3QXPEqZCHvWwXt2Q5sg tzpwr5Y86UQIBfENfStKkPexMa2VFqhM/mOeLOieFBfGq6fe1PDqdwf9QokUTg+2gVQC 1uzUfr/qgTriPtfDXUeH5yK+Dw75xntxZYWQ68NJWz1NowEbiXO0CnZIYnB4bOAGPIIJ lsBBO62MKgWKjO84q9wwUQtcS34J7abNpmw0HJAhTDe8f+VhchED0RUY6U0sVi0AoMkR 0zz2LBcG3LO8OYcnmluNhYR9AT1AU4rgkzWpX75qmkZba6o606+Q5dKE4OyUO/Ef+7ii 3JSw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1681147859; x=1683739859; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=B5x1nkhHIb5oAJcpGYSkIAALPpFDbQ+/jjVSoi6y14I=; b=QjsMBoGmfSe01KuIBxPWgCScqJm6/nsWvCHJoMsXXboUccrmFP30yfpOd5mg9hVvZ1 3GEORkTqZ/Ue5CEemLOktlhauZEhME5VmIqfDY0YILqsPeWS2gOMKCeKDSX/zFZ5jen0 O4LkUy/uL//91UsJqggHTOwkUk4Cqcs3lcftvuNpsZWwmiv5mPCeC+FiKZl+oicy49Vg Kaw0lSC2j6Mt4DhzjEZsEizCEZWDIfjX4GAOGkGiskWV82gD8o1kYti6PvW/hdKAR81y g+oec5teFn73wlJH8Tafq9yhS9cHRKVX3R2wbOUFLYt6fJxb5fZ8sBgv+AqILcNe6o7+ 3MbQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9f71uLQvhZI7AeZabzXZmxW1nJ+87RbhdHh0EXOM0b7lGXt77RI P+DgkP6ALyQT3Ze4lA0bIxKpxg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350YnyjjGv7a6ReLWzrcNIuNtkO67ozpWFywpRs0i0ybTTRMbePwGrJhGD7R1US2iRH7bz6/qDA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:c947:b0:1a2:79f0:f059 with SMTP id i7-20020a170902c94700b001a279f0f059mr15995647pla.28.1681147859238; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 10:30:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-120-218.wavecable.com. [204.195.120.218]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a11-20020a170902900b00b00196807b5189sm7978652plp.292.2023.04.10.10.30.58 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 10 Apr 2023 10:30:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 10:30:57 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: fwefew 4t4tg <7532yahoo@gmail.com> Cc: users@dpdk.org Subject: Re: DPDK and full TCP-IP stack Message-ID: <20230410103057.74121cc5@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org On Mon, 10 Apr 2023 13:08:15 -0400 fwefew 4t4tg <7532yahoo@gmail.com> wrote: > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65841190/does-dpdk-provide-a-native-tcp-ip-network-stack-implemetation > > points out there's no native TCP-IP in DPDK stack until v20.11. We're at > 23.03. Was this completed? No. There was never a full TCP-IP stack in DPDK. Doing one correctly, and supporting it, is a difficult effort. There are many one off projects doing TCP over DPDK. And FD.IO has a TCP host stack https://fd.io/docs/vpp/v2101/whatisvpp/hoststack.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A11542917 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 07:22:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EFE240DFD; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 07:22:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-qk1-f177.google.com (mail-qk1-f177.google.com [209.85.222.177]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28E8640A8B for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 07:22:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-qk1-f177.google.com with SMTP id u4so10577370qkp.11 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 22:22:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1681190524; x=1683782524; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=o2urlEgxQi2lvD3dgmhnGHdkd9NnsvseVp0/K9akU1s=; b=WvqogjIyMcMLHTOVfw1anHlqB6Daei2m/bGgKX2PuEUl6uYiRZqQ14xZXMIpgM40fy dVOEn8wRFEBPzaYZBL/ozQDCjEXOp5GPVeuvooUZVlHAwhuV5kbq9fPhgwu85iHFF3II RVUzSVCJE2GXzC0MT1/lQK/qWftLwdl8AQ/8z3rwW8Rl/V82xIAbB2SwlTK8xA+yMeg0 X8JuwvwBX7BwLOuOiDjdoSWNuyJxwJryjXZ9d2FuOo95pjcmqrth3+kPQEdX1rt+4+Kn wCYwDYcoFqMFqDn8gCPtXbxMwDX/upKXZRWyJ9U8msIZ2ShQzuoqMWZ4IPwsRgKMpYMg EsBQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1681190524; x=1683782524; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=o2urlEgxQi2lvD3dgmhnGHdkd9NnsvseVp0/K9akU1s=; b=BDlnwBUkBEUz6ygBM170LmDfLBCFTiS0Mb58a80XmfGm3f38eqEAPjOVnROlkWvOfa BqBLTBNztv47+7lo16oMdds3uK7w2gn5nbIejCkZ9h8vHqeKxrer0cjzaa8QylKUUwKE kqhQm/RbSbjrGAShuRhxoIzMLn7I9HPkryF59IIv6jHm4rR1rjoiIcMNHlSBxhntIQFC OYBM7BszHTmkmDI7mRIDroqRC/mDFZSOAeaRSW5bDKDX9QFoaKuJONsjY7dqf7Ejb7XO UgaT/PGOgiUJhxT4KW5dZKblS+Bw7auIi098nO9OEql3Y8SaC2dexreTyhHPl6/jy2c3 fnBg== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9cwy5cg1KsawIgaDVfAnCcBv/xhxNEyeHM46+BC7VSdqBlAagf3 lt3KIrXXBtI/fGs8Ctzfib5nfFXQPVV+VeGB3xM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350bVltV7yL8dOc6YUF9LaaQ4gsEdNlYwwhrPeOmx/nvdt4I1bvGIhOyd4lVgeKYwkOY7jYkjx547ylnN1zpKR80= X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1981:b0:745:6b06:8a0c with SMTP id bm1-20020a05620a198100b007456b068a0cmr4313200qkb.1.1681190524527; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 22:22:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230410103057.74121cc5@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: <20230410103057.74121cc5@hermes.local> From: Pavel Vazharov Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 08:21:53 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: DPDK and full TCP-IP stack To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: fwefew 4t4tg <7532yahoo@gmail.com>, users@dpdk.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000003ac2905f908ac24" X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org --00000000000003ac2905f908ac24 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable There is also F-stack which is basically the FreeBSD networking stack over DPDK. On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 8:31=E2=80=AFPM Stephen Hemminger < stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote: > On Mon, 10 Apr 2023 13:08:15 -0400 > fwefew 4t4tg <7532yahoo@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65841190/does-dpdk-provide-a-native-t= cp-ip-network-stack-implemetation > > > > points out there's no native TCP-IP in DPDK stack until v20.11. We're a= t > > 23.03. Was this completed? > > No. > There was never a full TCP-IP stack in DPDK. > Doing one correctly, and supporting it, is a difficult effort. > There are many one off projects doing TCP over DPDK. > And FD.IO has a TCP host stack > https://fd.io/docs/vpp/v2101/whatisvpp/hoststack.html > --00000000000003ac2905f908ac24 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
There is also F-stack which is basically the FreeBSD networking stack over DPDK.

On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 8:31=E2=80=AFPM Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote= :
On Mon, 10 Apr= 2023 13:08:15 -0400
fwefew 4t4tg <7= 532yahoo@gmail.com> wrote:

> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65841190/does-dpdk-provide-= a-native-tcp-ip-network-stack-implemetation
>
> points out there's no native TCP-IP in DPDK stack until v20.11. We= 're at
> 23.03. Was this completed?

No.
There was never a full TCP-IP stack in DPDK.
Doing one correctly, and supporting it, is a difficult effort.
There are many one off projects doing TCP over DPDK.
And FD.IO= has a TCP host stack https://fd.io/docs/vpp/v2= 101/whatisvpp/hoststack.html
--00000000000003ac2905f908ac24--