From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C758946FF0 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2025 10:45:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A174406BB; Tue, 9 Dec 2025 10:45:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-qv1-f44.google.com (mail-qv1-f44.google.com [209.85.219.44]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0CBF40270 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2025 10:45:07 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-qv1-f44.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-88246676008so61943776d6.3 for ; Tue, 09 Dec 2025 01:45:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1765273507; x=1765878307; darn=dpdk.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=91b6vy1gwZeZKD4dneFdPQEzc1LXPWiILYRE5gezMqo=; b=dFmI28k2uFC9RMwjD8cvVTnh/gUUOQhvX4egcefNggXueA2VBtkoVui/3iuC4+CCGb 8CLg8/sPiZxITAPXsNzM628l7/gpwbjQMZgL9+rAd0JQPtbn1ZtluGhAtIXgzmOUHxFK r9TrH54qiP9PC8eAd27D789k7pAzWSO6rfS00oSlF230CtwBDHwg6fYzE/dSOx5f70e/ NJUStbKMX4ZZ3SOHrn9dpcs8LPQ4D9PhjtUBYjW1QdFzB7tgxwy3+M6FXpex+Pv9snnV x6MK+P8mHTG4qJwcKHflYqzfcPP6MCHW6r8Dfr6LaK2lcGmGZckK4iBN3n2Um/OqK7EE 11Aw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1765273507; x=1765878307; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=91b6vy1gwZeZKD4dneFdPQEzc1LXPWiILYRE5gezMqo=; b=XwfAeWJBESiQ833L35dkdFZrfGAVjabOT9CHIfCsHvy7E/yb8DvzwOc+pXIv7hdUVD RXmIq+Sh7LLBkPR3GAoKy0bKpNj3NCAKav+WupWWWP/OkGCHVO14o/C2J/oipQmwkaat YZJvJc99yZHcbxN1cz2yPkPQ82OutsPJsEsk0era9wyZgAWgLQUG4CbJhU//xQn1I7tf BNyg9r5YRb+IK/1ppiF2vp1JeclKcO58P4/ejheReYTxxPp5zFxacYXX2RWPtw4HllVk Z8/ja2ZePs2pz3eB8BT6V2MMnELRY6HIbz1/t9+WfMgW+3GTnu5lLh13YXit8QFNTFzB RCjw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWYsNvcZwRVf6mBDykDVSNGZBRUxfX6wown/8f25RzUeoHMSgue+GlwKgxzyWRIooWRcaaEXA==@dpdk.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz72PKD79H4825p0y8u8iSGMsnFtccl3tvkP5F0e0iI7BubjMHk mJ8BQ8N+msC2jpNraQ0q0rZest09NDdcsSAOPCa7/83vC14j1HPElGfTYHmqnAvjOD9qMw0IULi E7QdgQcOBnxnPzOudEi7RW8nd+5+2hxA= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvOz5zhid1UYOmcEZnBWY+TIy/Emn0NbnMvYVPsr/xrSss8PgliHG7wnOaMH2U 38oDc/q4kugCyH1qhZcx+EQTOtm34yHG1Rn5NKTVpbFvK/NF4CbviI+inVDLC6rsOz5gxa/zFAf uZIQANE4wwQWGFRofqVmFSRurBOqmanbIraIqOezfCruyk/UG+vXBHZ3jghCganEV9UpNn8Yebw FqLObfss5MHe+slXQLnPvFfTMotbCzKsIxMJXiC91s5Qmhc5WdAb9nQl3gy+nF6ZNgsD/Dj X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHtyqUK/xO0j42pI0oX53qB/5VVRS7oVWsuN2yTTkWomEyNW6LKW6GA68UVwF0n1ln7dxZlzl9kxazuKjBzNfc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:e8e:b0:882:6797:3a67 with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-8883daba866mr179160806d6.13.1765273506877; Tue, 09 Dec 2025 01:45:06 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: coolwilled Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2025 17:44:55 +0800 X-Gm-Features: AQt7F2rJjJWjdEWau9yxFA9U2MLXr6EHSk4-YgW_i8igAkG5X-Xf7SlYGRponhI Message-ID: Subject: Ask help for DPAA_SEC: test_pdcp almost all cases failed To: hemant.agrawal@nxp.com, sachin.saxena@oss.nxp.com, g.singh@nxp.com, dev@dpdk.org, users@dpdk.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004f164f064581c403" X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org --0000000000004f164f064581c403 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi, NXP and dpdk.org users and developers Did anyone run test_pdcp on DPAA_SEC ? I have a NXP LS1046A board. I have configured DPAA sec and 4 dpaa_sec crypto_dev can be found in rte_eal_init(). I run dpdk-test from dpdk.org git commit = b287e404643a (24.11.3) and almost all cases execpt one PDCP status report case failed. I also run app/dpdk-test-crypto-perf throughput test with dpaa_sec. It only measures throughput and doesn't check correctness. I find the session is created with rte_security_session_create() in app/test-crypto-perf/cperfops.c for CPERF_PDCP. And session is created with rte_cryptodev_sym_session_create() in lib/pdcp/pdcp_crypto.c . Which type of session should be created ? How the test_pdcp can succeed in LS1046A DPAA_SEC ? Thanks a lot. --0000000000004f164f064581c403 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi, NXP and dpdk.org = users and developers

Did anyone run test_pdcp on D= PAA_SEC ?

I have a NXP LS1046A board.


--0000000000004f164f064581c403--