From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36B0041EA2 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2023 18:41:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED04240A7A; Wed, 15 Mar 2023 18:41:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-wr1-f49.google.com (mail-wr1-f49.google.com [209.85.221.49]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BC8A40141 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2023 18:41:42 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wr1-f49.google.com with SMTP id t15so18052291wrz.7 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2023 10:41:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1678902101; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=hm5EyvwCcQN3eMpYIbQVZ1Ozt5O8iO8tsyMkTC42dRw=; b=GFvtDMZE05ugjlpI+lWo2IIHW4IS8Vr/0ZGFM8ELxsSiaOiZK0GQam6AResnznjxnS 5MEx68CeipAb/h1fZl0KEBHN/Kx+FrsPuXQA2XX6uZDTD1Uz3WVmbv33r6z/52iYaIXc Z4iLMtjJ3uBcImgm6wvF6quOE/s8peDEpBch9mqUZ3/Nsuk0kVuaV3v1IwRJQsbdMhQl Rspnytx/EMlFojgZjkehVXkW0rhhRPIQMQTIFFKOvAJgeb9V0YAyp3XlVGRS/AZSf4Lz Dp+gfb7hBDv2AIFjYFUI6gYEtJovk02h41Md1TFCB6UAuFJJjMJoQgkx8C/iBrK6hlVj m7Rg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1678902101; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=hm5EyvwCcQN3eMpYIbQVZ1Ozt5O8iO8tsyMkTC42dRw=; b=a7raHdt3YXOdXeza8RFNYqA0IXcpyxG9qdtvc8iXf8pqnyrUQ9GVFdaEqH7gJYKbO2 iol8kLm9va7xJTsQ6cypFRcsT2EsJClVCw8nQ5NYoItxfpFMwLimo0Y/+0t2TLkj3unU 9BHG3A7d/nbTPplx3I0cRAPd30sAamyPWNVv4xr+r1fqSYIUYYP1m3bvllb5cU1C40Op 03CT5328RKEm5/73jE3nUwvkYgbwteZLq1JZiWUU0KwK+5R8eT9NK7Gicy3mowIFy05t RpvrY/Ag+u8lyZ1zaczCQRzcwbiYO644VjKxiPLjdrvoOo7Y+ZK6rGxPD7qlZ3ZD9Wdh fxMg== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKWXn+MkP9yvSYmM0eZFItxhUCrUJp6PTn5rz3vgJ8l4I7Si5+Av MbeLU7tkEFCZodm0tVZboo/56oo8weO/isYfB41RL+VF X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/k/6lbUCp4+JIp8vWcQUzzdmkRMD9N7Ep42nGlDDAmSBIJI1LuX0LPCbv+PSLEe6S/uVhldyuG2qtaNq5E/oI= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:494e:0:b0:2c8:6dd3:a2c5 with SMTP id r14-20020a5d494e000000b002c86dd3a2c5mr733434wrs.6.1678902101489; Wed, 15 Mar 2023 10:41:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Igor Gutorov Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 20:41:06 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: net_ring, net_memif are missing RX-missed counter To: users@dpdk.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005f39bc05f6f3db4d" X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org --0000000000005f39bc05f6f3db4d Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi, I've noticed that net_ring and net_memif PMDs always report RX-missed counter as 0. Is it just a feature that is missing, or is it something that fundamentally cannot be implemented for these PMDs? --0000000000005f39bc05f6f3db4d Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,

I've noticed that ne= t_ring and net_memif PMDs always report RX-missed counter as 0. Is it just = a feature that is missing, or is it something that fundamentally cannot be = implemented for these PMDs?
--0000000000005f39bc05f6f3db4d--