From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1528F462CC for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 20:03:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6FC74029F; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 20:03:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-ej1-f54.google.com (mail-ej1-f54.google.com [209.85.218.54]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCF594029A for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 20:03:22 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-ej1-f54.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-abee54ae370so12497566b.3 for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 11:03:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1740596601; x=1741201401; darn=dpdk.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=wRD+J4O27h2oY34mUunoYKU1DW9yImDmzfhxHP/DdtY=; b=Aj2GtZ14Jfb+SRm2soQjLauq8g3ZWxRDoefeaoZbjc4sbEsj3hTgH5rSIY7YXUlNdP 4hh7kvRTHVXc89na0TeCW/6WvzYNT187kTIlrvTFv/tFM8Blf7PYeM70x19pPRADwGw9 CVYhhbFwfVAQ337JbVQPtLlKMJ3oSUbSIUivx6mWEAsN0FV3QykHcQ3ygXBP3kEtfDYb P6EbX7NDaBr155Z3FYT29iUCqVlr5RXDRbvgIwiPGASoK6MxRiavlnonXJB+0cYoF2v5 poo4nIpI/Obyg9W4lVENxs1OGA+S5S1V+5aqs6PHZRneg6GQfHGVpjr9USIwtjY0Xtqz rjGw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1740596601; x=1741201401; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=wRD+J4O27h2oY34mUunoYKU1DW9yImDmzfhxHP/DdtY=; b=Aj2OIhEMr91Ehr6xIzIX+N0R/MRj4LN0C2i5M3lq5lXCkiFbNQoyyN+nPvjW48y/t8 G2H358h5V6hfdJ9og+LWVg33uYMXMdGIn/rmgBGFjOp4nxM9kydxKMRlDBM6yBn7K4kD trtolQrQiVVcFwu7kUAr4NS0U/ZwkmZoDEuE6fJfIaPTrGnCs80I2GpcYVfVLKcH8bLT UQttop55Ft3Ranwc31mvzRrmW/kZDAzeUskIoHghniHGT05rhgVYEDKNOkz316SHvZ5e 36qxp4OdUcn6ZMfi8Z9VW3JHgY0OwBMp9Yyo+ZZRELSmZ9SazZayakVekuJMmZG0YxMt wU4Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyw8ArnYBYss5ULfcXdb/yN+5o64ntz+rVaMa95BSIopPos8P/t 7zsA5Zh7XlJ9pMxvDUTrPQjwfdOKhPq8tIaioR375Xdf04XEINOXQP68R1I5MsnWy4/ZaZwr/fX u5I4jiISgKFIagF8mxXo4r5NUS5UrHg== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuQh6fdzJXEZ36/9RMsCNeMm6LEPRyzsL9/rf4C0uK0vDnEu6mpR2O9W8o4wx6 cIJc5m3igzoyNzGvyZ276J1LDMxZcPZODUGBWGywNL/b/tfKTHvH69piD13/CAWjSTGMhhqXfWR k4RpU+JVA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IET0ZK1Aak9YzJp66CSU4DknNFGjWyz/WxsP2WHNe7TVyxDWkZLQ/K+mlvXS9/uuw1ba3r3n5jew4exFgxqj9U= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7952:b0:abb:cdca:1c08 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-abeeee04193mr556180266b.16.1740596601253; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 11:03:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: hamidi Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 22:33:09 +0330 X-Gm-Features: AQ5f1JrM9_I1G6l-Wlt_8jcAaOQ80Z1bsh7dDYHxyAMQV3Noy8QCwQFb5Kbuu8w Message-ID: Subject: Fwd: 031208 - Incremental build of ACL To: users@dpdk.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001d7702062f103a43" X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org --0000000000001d7702062f103a43 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: hamidi Date: Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 10:07=E2=80=AFPM Subject: 031208 - Incremental build of ACL To: Hi Since build time is more than expected in my case, I thought about incremental build after some minor change in rules. For example, if I have about one million rules, and for building them, it has spent more than two minutes, I prefer not to spend so much time again when I add less than 10 rules later and if ACL supports building incrementally instead of rebuilding from scratch the goal can be touched. Is there any way to do this? Is there any way to remove some rules in the middle of work too? Thanks --0000000000001d7702062f103a43 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


---------- Forwarded m= essage ---------
From: h= amidi <h= amidi@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 10:07=E2=80=AF= PM
Subject: 031208 - Incremental build of ACL
To: <user@dpdk.org>


=
Hi
Since build time is = more than expected in my case, I thought about incremental build after some= minor change in rules. For example, if I have about one million rules, and= for building them, it has spent more than two minutes, I prefer not to spe= nd so much time again when I add less than 10 rules later and if ACL suppor= ts building incrementally instead of rebuilding from scratch the goal can b= e touched. Is there any way to do this?
=C2=A0Is there any way to remove some rules = in the middle of work too?
Thanks
--0000000000001d7702062f103a43--