From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C15E3A00E6 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 19:12:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0649B1B997; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 19:12:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-wr1-f47.google.com (mail-wr1-f47.google.com [209.85.221.47]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00C0E1B96E for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 19:12:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wr1-f47.google.com with SMTP id f9so12887253wre.12 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 10:12:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9MzFt0S4xFCPBtuSI3mqbIoa8v/qpbJdgraDgoK4eyk=; b=TPh+Zh5P7m+LHeANaVlAz8pDOhn8tyFRv1mMoAi8eAdZXNgncbnzK0GT+mbTQYbsXb gDJeAh/SpJafF3/n8WUL+p6+mfmQbLjpK4zU6ogUBObRDs9xzxBrOD2K1zSYRf7yBp3K 29YFTHeyXs7kcWpjlWx3up96ljC/JHeEqvHzRZu+VNJS0QK4YOxMzqP9MQNg7k92BS5v 1Oxf6GV10fm0FHFvEKFwQk8hAqN4+Tgo3A/V0hpPseQORMB1EssPpNIUj2ZwuAEgmmJs Fp+sn69eEBnbeXz2qu6ijdsthS754VML20Yh4Lh6EKAptfdI1KEPvsTeINPv1acgddPF JnTw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9MzFt0S4xFCPBtuSI3mqbIoa8v/qpbJdgraDgoK4eyk=; b=a8aUG8TXGFaaqiJUPcMfKbIoAJjgb6oJDREOIxFm4k46v+xw34hrfb3eaYCqk8rayg Pn/rYE1EHRz+7FxA1YoWlbeqfm/rWGohLCLlxc3PuxjQImmqTdXyMyN/+hQPdynYFbbq Tzh6IRTpA8wThpspkIwy+NbfY68Hy+SQN5MRjnmN4+NtrLe/cM651Q4ks649pooS8sjD IF9gSnZUBwGAJZ9bPYiHEA6i6o5yQGrhGpsfIYUP/eGiWV986mI1xklm9bgLTGCUg3hF A2WzBPm3VB1Narj8o5DkbY5UG7iV26f1JmNzJaB1ET0ka7yoj3xwqeVVFQBRVGAPceoa 3Nog== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUEJ+K8h5QwewzzEKXTsARlYOBCGhkfQaGYg2LQ4SobN5b9CMuQ uTm5x7mo9UpHY90+FME7A4vlzLBzNuqzxDCnUS4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqywPkzZmqQF0DJiOk91/0x36F/VyJ5toud5POzA5FqgOnXmqF/+H3EHO/UkWcPaSSfo5K9b/k8C+B7Ihw+ySFg= X-Received: by 2002:adf:9bcd:: with SMTP id e13mr18382469wrc.338.1563037926540; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 10:12:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190710085926.GA24200@intel.com> <20190711091502.GA39155@intel.com> In-Reply-To: From: Jags N Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2019 22:41:52 +0530 Message-ID: To: Ye Xiaolong Cc: users@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] only one vdev net_af_xdp being recognized X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "users" Hi Xiaolong, Played around a bit and found that for the 2nd vdev that was failing, ./tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c:xsk_create_bpf_maps() was succeeding for "qidconf_map", but failing for "xsks_map" map creation. Guessed could be related to memory. Tried increasing the max locked memory as suggested in many bpf links available in net, with "ulimit -l 128", and I am able to run testpmd with two vdev Thanks much for the help. Regards, Jags