From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ckdwibedy@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com (mail-wm0-f49.google.com [74.125.82.49])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2CA92BD6
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 08:14:01 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-wm0-f49.google.com with SMTP id t79so148240811wmt.0
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:14:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=6aCNb6164aRI6FSegT4FAPNNCDFNa38Qu9sli8L5OmU=;
 b=YlCYgjkTADud8Tl5uhaxA49tLGXjWG1ibunjZmqfKfNnCmBHm46YVfIdIi+Zpvoxbp
 etn435EV9h70Bn6gQeTFMngRblXaWmwiX3BrUIH9o3+Wp7h3Bkj7HVNYIv9jcq5MsD4N
 CPKhVrWKeSaAaVynTr45xzom29u4kieN9AOHUAxmdUMlwDnQeq2Oe9VDtzTQDp+nEOfD
 Rn4zbzRLBaZXUKvupTQl+fLc/ES+z4hLBUTgF1IXneAmt2tKEluxdyvpolp3KXrR34Km
 6mC8ftOmqrXlPWSke4uNhWyn5cjYpfRINeSLmv7UACDnrf0uA0YHNe4bc0N/Mw/1lcwK
 4GTw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=6aCNb6164aRI6FSegT4FAPNNCDFNa38Qu9sli8L5OmU=;
 b=Hcw3dKwrcoEdFosXbZgEFzMpiHuCJv7g9kgPEopnOeXOo5+26eI5HY03a1+MZurQTn
 S+QZOa3/P45Ix7CAFC/RiOHwbdadfPdbmLJtKSSjp/9cqYAyNGOMwCg+lu1E966p6ZvF
 w2XkJKRJIw/J60rF8OI8Qgc+lDd76nCY1lM5n1XSZbe4MMftmmyLNHxSl2cgMMuTe1vV
 +514nXSsIi1kqyzfSCZ/c1oclX2dX7jd457khR/i3QphOV4TU7xlwlbTIglMsc8C6oi5
 D7Vi/nKIWVhwx7S/4YPpFq+t/b3yA5JgucsNfHUhbkz7WaH8Fbozta53GFA8Q3eYP+4r
 3O1g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvftFBKOV0m2AgY1p/fQ0J7Bn5W0jwpsbm+tiPCb3rJx8LauYgQs7I3Ic2EVVrfiSGPfD1G0v56P+pnUQA==
X-Received: by 10.194.23.4 with SMTP id i4mr21947476wjf.185.1479194041183;
 Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:14:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.194.162.196 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:14:00 -0800 (PST)
From: Chinmaya Dwibedy <ckdwibedy@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 12:44:00 +0530
Message-ID: <CAMHS8REXbMA-Ra9pHCqdtpmOJwLFt9hf_8TUDpNFkSGXSOMgjQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: users@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-users] Is rte_get_timer_cycles()is same on all cores?
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 07:14:01 -0000

Hi,


I am using the rte_get_timer_cycles() function for IPv4 packet latency
calculation in dpdk application.  I think, it is same on all cores. Can
anyone please correct me if I am wrong?


Note that, I have CONFIG_RTE_LIBEAL_USE_HPET=n in configuration.


Regards,

Chinmaya