From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 324954241C for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 20:43:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2881642D65; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 20:43:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-lf1-f48.google.com (mail-lf1-f48.google.com [209.85.167.48]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9C7142D1C for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 20:43:30 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-lf1-f48.google.com with SMTP id d30so4743227lfv.8 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 11:43:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=JlaxXdV9VyfpZZJGbX+EvSf8Y9CgC2U1ITwRl89rUuM=; b=Q5hDcORm1ucAU5WeOWqqR2enHMFAigyoYXfQnEMLXhFkNNkeSTgsHOY/dZN9XFMwdv 4IEVEj1vwq9UIN9bo/kceYVD0MM5z/T1ZQ72Ex24EQPU8Awn7/X+eHo8rsUhYdaworDm HBFRoYSF6wjFWGodC8pRKfHgLMxee57HLV+A134RUUDOo7L5sOfRS51Sjn5acUhJoWT8 zNVo1A3sVAWaxPaUp1trKTJv8dpkZCR8ukQopr1sM7VD5LkIkhkYxUdmjQMlJBUdIHG7 H0G6wh3dBQ994T5ZFzOoSeljmp0yjE3pUA9VlX6UxsS04IJOUJeiS6/YitDS8k/s5J2/ y1kA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=JlaxXdV9VyfpZZJGbX+EvSf8Y9CgC2U1ITwRl89rUuM=; b=f0ef9r5PxCR8erwLQzuVqIn2FCEyXuYcWnSQ3YjD0cZaulctzfjMG908+wm371t7FP lfgG6wmC5/chjbZ+eqGOZJ0/xWCOl3RBlLe2KxlehJRFnnLjIIB5aLsxCWDFRomObWPy HXcr1tHoQu9YRjRt97jIohOYqiCDlznb+F02MUXnnAa7P1r9k75kiUv+omAcBxc0r+Y1 dDuK4GnycFumRj+CNRF2XB9+IhKsmFbDGTiL2o6jX9ZYL/OGB51beZhmK/GhdjASZO26 YMCGlmLLTYQyX3M/Dl3Ow2s6KbxMU7skZnBvssBUjsprKccHRl1xhr3HQq1XxvQG8PYb 20Ug== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kom0h450fG5IQ+BlbcysYd7LnllkdlYS1K7eIuORZ3jRALYp+sL j278YAYhQkJJBhBdzPc/luTO+dd8J2NtXiDeV3pFIgZb/hw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXuCW0MEHCOxWw3oZ6p7yPJrVvB0wEwNA2nryJygw5Qdk6i/7vbt7l/avpT3SsZM1jXgUO6WRXyr3bO32kE/t4s= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:10c9:b0:4d5:a733:8591 with SMTP id k9-20020a05651210c900b004d5a7338591mr12167lfg.383.1674157409941; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 11:43:29 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Priya Ramanathan Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 13:43:19 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Does DPDK supports EPOLL for 10G X550T (ixgbe driver) To: users@dpdk.org Cc: Koteswararao Kondepu , andreaf Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b7bb2105f2a325d4" X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org --000000000000b7bb2105f2a325d4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hello, We use two NIC cards - 10G X550T (ixgbe) for the DPDK-based application. The application uses EPOLL for the UDP communication between the server and the client. With the kernel driver, the EPOLL works properly, but when we enable DPDK support, we cannot see the communication correctly. I would like to know whether anyone has tested DPDK with EPOLL on the 10G X550T model. Also, please suggest which NIC models have been verified using DPDK with EPOLL for UDP communication. Thank you. Regards, Priya. --000000000000b7bb2105f2a325d4 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello,

We use two NIC cards - 10G X550T= (ixgbe) for the DPDK-based=C2=A0application.
The application use= s EPOLL for the UDP communication between the server and the client.
<= div>With the kernel driver, the EPOLL works properly, but when we enable DP= DK support, we cannot see the communication correctly.

=
I would like to know whether anyone has tested DPDK with EPOLL on the = 10G X550T model.
Also, please suggest which NIC models have been = verified using DPDK with EPOLL for UDP communication. Thank you.
=
Regards,
Priya.


=
--000000000000b7bb2105f2a325d4--