From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A648245980 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2024 00:21:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28BE240156; Thu, 19 Sep 2024 00:21:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-vk1-f170.google.com (mail-vk1-f170.google.com [209.85.221.170]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6B674003C for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2024 00:21:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-vk1-f170.google.com with SMTP id 71dfb90a1353d-502b144f31bso83507e0c.1 for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 15:21:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1726698063; x=1727302863; darn=dpdk.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=8drLtJUZH2MtzfDqRYJpoVI79HO1/280Rn4gdZcfw54=; b=jHDmsQTFt2JjbfBL6lM0iY5vstPCvUEdgWETRERG2C/FIC+MMQEGbaGZZAHzrAq1AH fyeQmD+41c+hODOS5tkhFGPTTzqsPPmWVkbMMWrCelq7+m9Ti8VhN2uve8nHKXSv8Rkc ey61WVFu8pi34oyB+fzB/ON7qyD8m3Ifv8Pw56x34LUFSQHgkGrd/NYkI7u/uIau0/U/ k2Ilbgkeb5FeMBm/qvuP4E06+hC5qty+G1EpjUUp+TnjE50z8i+w6ojyJ9cMsLN+hiwp fGZOlRg221rG1z3kvqTOKkDCsVAdL44tP5BCTp+ZUwacZjulAFwgGiGANZGb07Z7R6Di PBhw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1726698063; x=1727302863; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=8drLtJUZH2MtzfDqRYJpoVI79HO1/280Rn4gdZcfw54=; b=OQZuK6xpH5FaCXCgzLf5t1NmKAGTsdvoy3gWLVpLLHMCoH2qH2fwQh5ElNALK0Liav lZ4UFQ6v3FTULJkKgyTUIpJ7aa6WVkOJicZQOqc1iydHuwvR49fQwn0JRLIv4X9yfxKH gNNHdQ3Levq+HPYeqxFm+UcQ7L642smWi65pOk7UYLQV6R6R/lEjwf+8Iy64zXmHE1bN IEHebNripGFOrwllsm4Q0+Uic5SvVEE9Ej5z5wwuKMFy6gzWL9PS6vWBWCm76e/ch35g cFneMbOzDgBRDdg4kHR+Ih0i/4ho0T4/esFB5RNx8hZ23IG8UDjEPExNuImgA9k90Cos n4TA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwVGAljQkg1AQWqTBvVmnq354Qt1oJzs4gcRqeKcxb483XnvIOb 6drSta165bVYlze46psBIdGYRM9MIfoUBJA1o/OzKAv63BsMdzItu1nmjS8VrAliVdfZ6HU5Xp/ KPxIjIdT7/+mq09aitX9xkklrP5o6XvgSj+k= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG7B3sW/oc9GXc4vskYsV/eYM1yxBPT4upjg+wxgR39WrCIaKSz9+ds8aleKNCMkzH7qg92mYurnLQWe9VgOMA= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:160d:b0:48f:e6e0:7c04 with SMTP id ada2fe7eead31-49d4132bebamr20300271137.0.1726698062923; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 15:21:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Vincent Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 18:20:53 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: DPDK lacp bonding - xmit hash To: users@dpdk.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000acd0bc06226c387c" X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org --000000000000acd0bc06226c387c Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" What determines what xmit_hash_policy DPDK will use for LACP bonded links? Does it not respect the value specified by /sys/class/net//bonding/xmit_hash_policy? Based on testing, it seems like layer2, or layer3+4 hashing is being done, but the behavior is random, and seems to not necessarily reflect the current value specified by /sys/class/net//bonding/xmit_hash_policy. Thank you, Vincent --000000000000acd0bc06226c387c Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
What determines what xmit_hash_policy DPDK will use for LA= CP bonded links? Does it not respect the value specified by /sys/class/net/= <INTERFACE>/bonding/xmit_hash_policy?

Based on testing, it see= ms like layer2, or layer3+4 hashing is being done, but the behavior is rand= om, and seems to not necessarily reflect the current value specified by /sy= s/class/net/<INTERFACE>/bonding/xmit_hash_policy.

<= div>Thank you,

Vincent
--000000000000acd0bc06226c387c--