From: Alan Beadle <ab.beadle@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: users@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: mbufs getting reused despite nonzero refcnt
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 08:02:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANTAOdw6o6zWy3PC+Nq0cK2Skn1_5UwEX3j1=_=PziWUeR6VvA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANTAOdyVaUG3t8QjRo6-CQu3gLi9jO+koFkoaL4XbEjFgN6eoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Is there anything in the usage I described in my previous email which
might explain this problem? Is there anything else wrong with what I'm
doing driver-wise?
On Sun, Nov 10, 2024 at 12:31 PM Alan Beadle <ab.beadle@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I'm using the vfio-pci module with Intel X550-T2 NICs. I believe this
> means it will use the ixgbe driver? To be honest, I am a bit confused
> about the use of drivers in DPDK. I am using the first setup that I
> got to work and send/receive packets. Additional tips would be greatly
> appreciated. After loading the vfio-pci module I run dpdk-devbind.py
> --bind vfio-pci 65:00.1 and then I just use the standard DPDK API
> calls in my app. I was meaning to revisit this once my app was more
> complete.
>
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2024 at 12:12 PM Stephen Hemminger
> <stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 11:23:29 -0500
> > Alan Beadle <ab.beadle@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > I am using DPDK to send two-way traffic between a pair of machines. My
> > > application has local readers, remote acknowledgments, as well as
> > > automatic retries when a packet is lost. For these reasons I am using
> > > rte_mbuf_refcnt_update() to prevent the NIC from freeing the packet
> > > and recycling the mbuf before my local readers are done and the remote
> > > reader has acknowledged the message. I was advised to do this in an
> > > earlier thread on this mailing list.
> > >
> > > However, this does not seem to be working. After running my app for
> > > awhile and exchanging about 1000 messages in this way, my queue of
> > > unacknowledged mbufs is getting corrupted. The mbufs attached to my
> > > queue seem to contain data for newer messages than what is supposed to
> > > be in them, and in some cases contains a totally different type of
> > > packet (an acknack for instance). Obviously this results in retries of
> > > those messages failing to send the correct data and my application
> > > gets stuck.
> > >
> > > I have ensured that the refcount is not reaching 0. Each new mbuf
> > > immediately has the refcnt incremented by 1. I was concerned that
> > > retries might need the refcnt bumped again, but if I bump the refcount
> > > every time I resend a specific mbuf to the NIC, the refcounts just
> > > keep getting higher. So it looks like re-bumping it on a resend is not
> > > necessary.
> > >
> > > I have ruled out other possible explanations. The mbufs are being
> > > reused by rte_pktmbuf_alloc. I even tried playing with the EAL
> > > settings related to the number of mbuf descriptors and saw my changes
> > > directly correlate with how long it takes this problem to occur. How
> > > do I really prevent the driver from reusing packets that I still might
> > > need to resend?
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance,
> > > -Alan
> >
> > Which driver, could be a driver bug.
> >
> > Also, you should be able to trace mbuf functions, either with rte_trace
> > or by other facility.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-12 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-10 16:23 Alan Beadle
2024-11-10 17:12 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-11-10 17:31 ` Alan Beadle
2024-11-12 13:02 ` Alan Beadle [this message]
2024-11-14 16:14 ` Alan Beadle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CANTAOdw6o6zWy3PC+Nq0cK2Skn1_5UwEX3j1=_=PziWUeR6VvA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=ab.beadle@gmail.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=users@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).