DPDK usage discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Beadle <ab.beadle@gmail.com>
To: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>
Cc: users@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: Multiprocess App Problems with tx_burst
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 11:05:37 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANTAOdxkC3KPYKz4XJ+Y4ggr-wUGe0q+bCUWrpwd8o2tmrD=xg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANTAOdwoqhLmbkWc6LTEzgP59J09tf1L5LLMFW9k4nCXqZatbA@mail.gmail.com>

> Note that I am also seeing another error. Sometimes, rather than tx
> failing, my app detects incorrect/corrupted mbuf contents and exits
> immediately. It appears that mbufs are being re-allocated when they
> should not be. I thought I had finally solved this (see my earlier
> threads) but with multi-core concurrency this problem has returned. It
> is very possible that this error is somewhere in my own library code,
> as it looks like the accompanying non-DPDK structures are also being
> corrupted (probably first).
>
> For background, I maintain a hash table of header structs to track
> individual mbufs. The sequence numbers in the headers should match
> those contained in the mbuf's payload. This check is failing after a
> few hundred successful data messages have been exchanged between the
> hosts. The sequence number in the mbuf shows that it is in the wrong
> hash bucket, and the sequence number in the header is a large
> corrupted value which is out of range for my sequence numbers (and
> also not matching the bucket).
>

There is definitely something going wrong with the mbuf allocator.
Each run results in such different errors that it is difficult to add
instrumentation for a specific one, but one frequent error is that a
newly allocated mbuf already has a refcnt of 2, and contains data that
I am still using elsewhere. At each call to rte_pktmbuf_alloc() (with
locks around it) I immediately do a rte_mbuf_refcnt_read() and ensure
that it is 1. Sometimes it is 2. This should never occur and I believe
it proves that DPDK is not working as expected here for some reason.

-Alan

  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-06 16:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-31 17:49 Alan Beadle
2025-01-04 16:22 ` Alan Beadle
2025-01-04 18:40   ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2025-01-04 19:16     ` Alan Beadle
2025-01-04 22:01       ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2025-01-05 16:01         ` Alan Beadle
2025-01-06 16:05           ` Alan Beadle [this message]
2025-01-06 20:10             ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2025-01-06 20:34               ` Alan Beadle
2025-01-07 16:09                 ` Alan Beadle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CANTAOdxkC3KPYKz4XJ+Y4ggr-wUGe0q+bCUWrpwd8o2tmrD=xg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=ab.beadle@gmail.com \
    --cc=dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com \
    --cc=users@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).