From: Alan Beadle <ab.beadle@gmail.com>
To: users@dpdk.org
Subject: Multiprocess App Problems with tx_burst
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2024 12:49:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANTAOdy1fpxKkUZYsDs+0LeZkEvnKn=b7HGTUyksVpTJGiNYDA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hi everyone,
I am working on a multi-process DPDK application. It uses one NIC, one
port, and both separate processes send as well as receive, and they
share memory for synchronization and IPC.
I had previously made a mistake in setting up the lcores, and all of
the processes were assigned to the same physical core. This seems to
have concealed some DPDK thread safety issues which I am now dealing
with.
I understand that rte_eth_tx_burst() and rte_eth_rx_burst() are not
thread safe. Previously I did not have any synchronization around
these functions. Now that I am successfully using separate cores, I
have added a shared spinlock around all invocations of these
functions, as well as around all mbuf frees and allocations.
However, when my code sends a packet, it checks the return value of
rte_eth_tx_burst() to ensure that the packet was actually sent. If it
fails to send, my app exits with an error. This was not previously
happening, but now it happens every time I run it. I thought this was
due to the lack of synchronization but it is still happening after I
added the lock. Why would rte_eth_tx_burst() be failing now?
Thank you,
-Alan
next reply other threads:[~2024-12-31 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-31 17:49 Alan Beadle [this message]
2025-01-04 16:22 ` Alan Beadle
2025-01-04 18:40 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2025-01-04 19:16 ` Alan Beadle
2025-01-04 22:01 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2025-01-05 16:01 ` Alan Beadle
2025-01-06 16:05 ` Alan Beadle
2025-01-06 20:10 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2025-01-06 20:34 ` Alan Beadle
2025-01-07 16:09 ` Alan Beadle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CANTAOdy1fpxKkUZYsDs+0LeZkEvnKn=b7HGTUyksVpTJGiNYDA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=ab.beadle@gmail.com \
--cc=users@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).