DPDK usage discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Beadle <ab.beadle@gmail.com>
To: users@dpdk.org
Subject: Corrupted payload when sending many individual mbufs in loop
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 17:36:31 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANTAOdy7sNDDHDgL_Ow7xBJWeYEgbbik7Ab7x4wm0uFmgzFsXQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

Hello,

I am working on an application that involves fragmenting a large
buffer into many smaller packets/mbufs and sending them with DPDK. The
fragment packets for each data buffer are currently sent in a loop
without any throttling (I plan to add some sort of rate limiting
later). I am not using any of the special DPDK features for IP
fragmention. I am simply preparing and sending mbufs for each
fragment.

The problem I am having is that when I need to send large buffers,
which involve many packets being sent in a tight loop, sometimes part
of the payload is corrupted when received on the other machine. This
is rare and only happens above a certain data rate. I would like to
have a reliable way to detect (or even better, prevent) this
corruption.

Out of paranoia I placed an rte_compiler_barrier() and then an
rte_mb() (a memory barrier) between the code that prepares the mbuf
and the actual tx_burst(). It did not help and I think it should be
unnecessary.

I found some information about the function rte_mbuf_check() and have
started using it to check every received packet on the other end. It
fails to detect this corruption.

Any advice would be appreciated.
-Alan

             reply	other threads:[~2025-02-04 22:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-04 22:36 Alan Beadle [this message]
2025-02-04 23:26 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-02-04 23:31   ` Alan Beadle
2025-02-05 12:13     ` Alan Beadle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CANTAOdy7sNDDHDgL_Ow7xBJWeYEgbbik7Ab7x4wm0uFmgzFsXQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ab.beadle@gmail.com \
    --cc=users@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).