From: Alan Beadle <ab.beadle@gmail.com>
To: users@dpdk.org
Subject: mbufs getting reused despite nonzero refcnt
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2024 11:23:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANTAOdyTaJCuMt8FccJOOkdu5kJ36Xt8=FwGoNOccPqin6W5fw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hi everyone,
I am using DPDK to send two-way traffic between a pair of machines. My
application has local readers, remote acknowledgments, as well as
automatic retries when a packet is lost. For these reasons I am using
rte_mbuf_refcnt_update() to prevent the NIC from freeing the packet
and recycling the mbuf before my local readers are done and the remote
reader has acknowledged the message. I was advised to do this in an
earlier thread on this mailing list.
However, this does not seem to be working. After running my app for
awhile and exchanging about 1000 messages in this way, my queue of
unacknowledged mbufs is getting corrupted. The mbufs attached to my
queue seem to contain data for newer messages than what is supposed to
be in them, and in some cases contains a totally different type of
packet (an acknack for instance). Obviously this results in retries of
those messages failing to send the correct data and my application
gets stuck.
I have ensured that the refcount is not reaching 0. Each new mbuf
immediately has the refcnt incremented by 1. I was concerned that
retries might need the refcnt bumped again, but if I bump the refcount
every time I resend a specific mbuf to the NIC, the refcounts just
keep getting higher. So it looks like re-bumping it on a resend is not
necessary.
I have ruled out other possible explanations. The mbufs are being
reused by rte_pktmbuf_alloc. I even tried playing with the EAL
settings related to the number of mbuf descriptors and saw my changes
directly correlate with how long it takes this problem to occur. How
do I really prevent the driver from reusing packets that I still might
need to resend?
Thanks in advance,
-Alan
next reply other threads:[~2024-11-10 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-10 16:23 Alan Beadle [this message]
2024-11-10 17:12 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-11-10 17:31 ` Alan Beadle
2024-11-12 13:02 ` Alan Beadle
2024-11-14 16:14 ` Alan Beadle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CANTAOdyTaJCuMt8FccJOOkdu5kJ36Xt8=FwGoNOccPqin6W5fw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=ab.beadle@gmail.com \
--cc=users@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).