From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E72D461C0 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2025 23:35:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AB8940280; Fri, 7 Feb 2025 23:35:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-oa1-f54.google.com (mail-oa1-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B8A940270 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2025 23:34:59 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-oa1-f54.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-2b85cad3ac5so143061fac.1 for ; Fri, 07 Feb 2025 14:34:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1738967698; x=1739572498; darn=dpdk.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=rr2qAECriy3NWaINjgQMm6f0Eitr4XP8JV1jC2XAqNs=; b=TGhQQzxbWVQ09EJy5I8yLy9TXhuGI7u5sWltn+F8c6DR3y6E3vq8uYkKxRSPjwsH0N nim2uNbB5hZo/nQ5nfjDUXx+SwYQg3wm3V04TtgAMhwXnkw3hRMPsaNxwwe6xatz8tjg RkPxsSF8Ns4kBnrU7YCuGRILQoLCHW9XTk71SK+3QGU+VSWZIvoYUJ1A/y3Iqo0ms6OD w/i2nTdY3ANCQ7KVJKiPYjEMIr4PBvoQJ988n4BPZH/3fD+I+Zm6TWWg4gseIwIqb899 dkSu3YgPpsD+YPefxgtOLZl4YLA8GY7URy2eH58Ku+1nRhCbiCjjBU/SgR6fPeyojwmi cjEQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1738967698; x=1739572498; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=rr2qAECriy3NWaINjgQMm6f0Eitr4XP8JV1jC2XAqNs=; b=G7XrWvtf5Ln1XYTybcLJZkmpzeqdrQu7ryVPtZKNhayDh4KRjuatQ5NsPNShosKLbn 3tz8ggbgJzp9fOZi9H41uVVj30rtkD610yx4NwUh3Cz23pYqQs3Hz6em0D9/Ky0KFlzj ZBgrr+BEdOivLX9FfpBHQJVmOXff1jbpGIpJyBVeb15CoBrAIreirU3xaLo5E/ziUJTs JOVcOViWyru9n1FZc/c7g6RPhtoAJBhU5YU/l9n6V5UJnW4F8umPlkFa65tUEbzYyir3 gYONhrWx3j9Ni9lL0cdWEIlFRADWitzV7ZlsG5JP6QpJqVMry/mILbf5G3uIL5cmZdqm m3+A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwBdxIVFVlwOAUnC7qBYM2gVcXPN7n44kerOCdU4o9r8EeIW5uB INJdhnTpkxC2IE4bKa3ekKD2LuSTDAiJIXD8w8QJk2aE0RTLfgYPOAeFQW1fug4zFnY3ZszdtNA dpgv5A07Z9Zi24Q76Ux7gS0aC6wgT6wZg X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvpElF037Yo81LCR/2t8Vytg1W3lX0tzSuV+GvYOYoW/mLZAj3gsV/n22nF3gt UNKiAFNf0O108FwlYITri4DXtsnClmGCUTgMpjbQuBtrF2La/nNn27hJuLfX0v2wMGLwIf3c= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGZl0QmT4PX+27EpZD4my/svWQQatt6E/cqiQyc6pgoldQCA2sYkl2P7H4mImfAd78nuT/5ILZ6unqVMBG2k88= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:7993:b0:29e:37af:a943 with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-2b8403a9d6fmr2907467fac.18.1738967698370; Fri, 07 Feb 2025 14:34:58 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Alan Beadle Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 17:34:47 -0500 X-Gm-Features: AWEUYZnx95-yv_x-mJqjBrG7-St9AOLx8NAoGtjndcfAe8KnAWKKIg9HwlXw3zE Message-ID: Subject: Re: UDP Checksum offload with X550-T2 To: users@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Apparently I just needed to increase the TX ring size. I'm still having trouble getting anywhere close to the theoretical 10 gigabit bandwidth of my NIC without running into TX failures. Should that be feasible with an MTU of 1514 bytes? I'm not even taxing the CPU very much now that checksum offload is working.