From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A641DA0351 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 13:26:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 759D51C114; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 13:26:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-wr1-f46.google.com (mail-wr1-f46.google.com [209.85.221.46]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67DE81BFF3 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 13:26:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wr1-f46.google.com with SMTP id y3so14614941wrl.4 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 04:26:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=KAHyYgGO3XOh4IgNPPThJpb6560n47zl5tJq513ZJo4=; b=iNtaXYXzLB0rk+r3bHtNAozsJoHPdTncp/RQudc3bw3BLTT6RpT8neT+4wLJeNOzCO 4vQYPLE3qJ/q0nvtIRGE+5JXDeQFsjTWJWsnn4fVZWxMBthBLXYBlWA+mTl1OwK24LAE xJUTYH1I4k4Nit8x3PNyB/LyD9FRalR588m8fv6NsFO0XK/5aBgdxUV4xy9oMe6Zsxkp FMIztj7yC0wkMvzRBSe1hbI8+fIeb/GOwc7g9//nd8ZDnF6jOy8BOcf+f30Mn7h04aOG 6oWKSSd5TL70A4cL/nPBy1ngZi/ETjE+S87vTwj85eD5OpsSZhFFUKPCuslSavgUPGa6 zJsA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=KAHyYgGO3XOh4IgNPPThJpb6560n47zl5tJq513ZJo4=; b=kNFgDaWAZbhwpHBeVDMNTSYDXuDRqm8fhUmNdy/qfRhLMyWxg/1os9IMUyuZQ08+WQ KgMVWuQZnS3B+0J4JuYer1f/tQXY8ZfoO8TPjv9BTW9hsVaZpv+kWX2GUfhOA9g4AAVX eKvq+/wMwfHclGfvGB0TdVbWDrCr2TAlgKc9Uq8bKnwlTTAlNxONwbO01anaMBu9YB4i ZwHJk09eyCl4hHF7qhPaZPIHg/5lhChbAOKmZXqoKFskzzh3s7VrsflkHkRC1gDLSbmF UDgmJ9xCsaXBuyzoZ7HtjjCQkmVCVBNkmKV0vjIqgA1uuTBRa1oFRG+gppCLzwZzyCbf UxyQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ibLKbfLJ0UfRURB421p4EdowhlY75yRLO78sfYmKD6LydazsZ o1fbd5FYUkzwi1I3NBM7ySkjle2vEuADAE1azADvpmhTa/MijQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzaxeZh6FGDg3VrFFGu0plQnIsF26rawjp9iaLCmI3BnQMSZxgdsYGe66rXRvKMQFBRKmsHOfSPyUEDZrJ2tdo= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5485:: with SMTP id h5mr14265572wrv.427.1597663571965; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 04:26:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Chandrika Gautam Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 16:56:00 +0530 Message-ID: To: users@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: [dpdk-users] Help - Query related to hugepages and rte_ring X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "users" Hi, We are using only ring buffers from DPDK and we are observing good performance without using hugepages! We are facing some issue in our application using hugepages for which we have raised a separate query. I wanted to understand whether configuring 1G hugepages for an application using ring_buffers only will show an improvement further in our application ? We are using below APIs and have Single Consumer and Single Producer rte_ring_create rte_ring_dequeue rte_ring_enqueue Regards, Chandrika