From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADC9FA0093 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2022 10:29:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80A3A4067B; Thu, 17 Mar 2022 10:29:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-ua1-f54.google.com (mail-ua1-f54.google.com [209.85.222.54]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDD6740151 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2022 10:29:36 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-ua1-f54.google.com with SMTP id i26so1843053uap.6 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2022 02:29:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=e2BtAEOIzZK1qokSIeRwp+NPI1dvExaQwo4QPavE4j8=; b=Kdo4YmOXRHKiLDkIdZbXaDAZID+xPcdRCTKeMJCzKCxp88h2sfhsVrgE3yTDgkDs2u ysq7t7tgHOEOb74iG4IKxjEvKzg+iV7GJIp0JV0o7qRBoBegCxAYzQ+dVmdA3vXaHYcQ /OlLA1WCunVYr3UYpKywQ7DXQ5ZIGbq9dQWs9K4iuo2xwxoTBOW8RiV7PVr2ZRH/t0JD jP2RmtFOnjPCUY+eFiHueyJeXeeAvlkaQpvrHc/yakuaW23IncDQqZEoNs45ly0RVPvQ OARrUZQpBBH6hc8lEQ+WR7aQmPICypIMolAf7a+qEUrpkhPyLPc6M8chu5+fNNXCWvIR 7mEQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=e2BtAEOIzZK1qokSIeRwp+NPI1dvExaQwo4QPavE4j8=; b=XcJv6jREVN1CO1WXsqcgxrvV7XpZLAFeqBFrCYP62IQUrA8ldnLDYUE2xz5Hr7/kue VaN+nKXveOUvDmKN42HiLkSGSSOVdBsCWXmvpGC4B/vFPf7XUEO7KvdjD7GuWQYnEfct 2PHXm5fLvrWQ5c1zogNZCxxf1HsSf0Qsx85+dd262dM7dWMklQfw7GEmultw4R/R/G9+ BU2EXoP7OcC3TbqUK7dBbSihZGuUnfCfePfwZfAlYrC0ytpKJwPLytxP1loTpxzuoF7H OO5V4w5PZGyCl8JwgfkMZhLo1Oi8ShU/HNGMLiphTQ/iG83KxkhSsje7537J6GB8jNEh ZQPg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5300EpqE75xuC7cVAsevPUWwGWSsTpysQqGVBkmwbc8jSkVHD1EB 2h9GKtuseW+Y6GXwwaJ8/kS4SYS66CNZq9hykOLcRZmeAz0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzQpPRwmzUOa6QOZ4agjuObV+EaVHz4xcNpPM1Hh+aJUHoi+yeTxqSglYmdjvCPObthIqYv/ooZuhI0bIq40I8= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:7e4b:0:b0:341:2c61:b9a3 with SMTP id e11-20020ab07e4b000000b003412c61b9a3mr1234487uax.88.1647509376049; Thu, 17 Mar 2022 02:29:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Antonio Di Bacco Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 10:29:25 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Connecting two DPDK applications through fake virtual functions To: users@dpdk.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001fa5bb05da66ab1f" X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org --0000000000001fa5bb05da66ab1f Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I have two DPDK applications that are using virtual functions built on top of two physical functions that correspond to the two ports of a 25 Gbps ethernet card. The two physical ports are connected one to the other with an optic fiber. Now, I would like to realize the same setup but without using a physical 25 Gbps card, I wonder if this is possible. --0000000000001fa5bb05da66ab1f Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I have two DPDK applications that are using virtual functi= ons built on top of two physical functions that=C2=A0correspond to the two = ports of a 25 Gbps ethernet card. The two physical ports are connected one = to the other with an optic fiber.=C2=A0 =C2=A0
Now, I would like to rea= lize the same setup but without using a physical 25 Gbps card, I wonder if = this is possible.

--0000000000001fa5bb05da66ab1f--