From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9EE944096 for ; Wed, 22 May 2024 08:47:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FC4B400D7; Wed, 22 May 2024 08:47:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-ej1-f43.google.com (mail-ej1-f43.google.com [209.85.218.43]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 461B1400D6 for ; Wed, 22 May 2024 08:47:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-ej1-f43.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a59b49162aeso922675066b.3 for ; Tue, 21 May 2024 23:47:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1716360427; x=1716965227; darn=dpdk.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Ou2SsHGyoX6OdnMQrP4Hf6OMf4wkgnJvTHer54UzjCQ=; b=cqjUv20okS6j9Pz1vgNYGbO8ro90dF9qSVTCCx8++80odGkgHNlXlY/ANc95IAbByW ycvRlruipO2pP6hP6gCgIYl50wjBBp5M/VkdVAJxXvTQViMmTrAeTLoSlf++6gvD0T2b 6IJcrmk0P3AG/1S8QqoeGCtoAG5TwBcofHtU7exu2GJg3gyaCVV9YnfZFuaqJ3/sQzqf ZNmsjzsvLOtGaQ9/wWILFR9SD65Ypuvg/zfE+CU4PbtUT01sNWBY8me5nxCHWXPmLqu+ n3l/WiBfphkqobb8CtbAtE+yibzraNnAGKbn4muSyT0QpFVmebtnX3GIo9rrVNsouMZ8 9B/w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1716360427; x=1716965227; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Ou2SsHGyoX6OdnMQrP4Hf6OMf4wkgnJvTHer54UzjCQ=; b=Qen1HjLFiWwTmWDS4OlbQoe0gKT4YQzFpo6SANAf4ZzH/xd4OO6wqZcMeVsgi1fmpx qOLdFseXQXSvm3YY8DKvwz2kDD7/YwIlek3ra2+uxPOSWeC1dsPSQIAr3CpdPab7N0MR pvda3eRbBWVkzK5F1cysk3SHM91b27V191N5YQDl/oaIV/OosBMw8X9PWUdU0xZDsvc2 KFslad/4dSxICdrPoBdgTkftNKhUUWKALmmrs2izk8+oSugfquOzeajDan+S3n+l3LLX aF6hoGykS6dOoplcEhUCTv6IGEF81ByffM407jcImSQRQEfd4TnULpoeG0hiEnZQg9/z pBxg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzW+EdOlMPTN3XHW/Hx1FGtTA5ai4ZsEF1+K4DRMA8aIeXTtqPP p/81dDR9kS/FdCTf/BDeHRbwvxbnVPDHWSJVslJQr6IZSXdKHSfD/XXMZd93MZQEku7SZ8W+6SI I8Nt5DKz46F9G9fYk2lD0ulpzsixvKDwgDUg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFQbYDkANzq5eIt2SA03IHxZQnzyb7ygkCJLk0scXWjcEphc9NwROsxNILTBuqVtGQrHgYOkrwvdDJHZa8WUAk= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:c9d:b0:a59:bbd6:bb39 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a62281642demr52711866b.55.1716360426551; Tue, 21 May 2024 23:47:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Antonio Di Bacco Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 08:46:55 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Request to map PCI device in a secondary that uses the --block for that device To: users@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Is it correct that a primary requests a secondary to map a device that the secondary explicitly blocks with the --block arg ? IN my case this requests of mapping creates a crash in the secondary. Using DPDK 21.11 Best regards, Antonio.