From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <users-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05AF3A04FD
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Sun,  3 Jul 2022 17:57:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 807A540E50;
	Sun,  3 Jul 2022 17:57:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-ot1-f49.google.com (mail-ot1-f49.google.com
 [209.85.210.49]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E3040685
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Sun,  3 Jul 2022 17:57:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-ot1-f49.google.com with SMTP id
 cb12-20020a056830618c00b00616b871cef3so5888914otb.5
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Sun, 03 Jul 2022 08:57:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=5Z39GEsBjORwISWaicADLx/WIDAI0mi6e6e1RcsPWMM=;
 b=Kw6Y3ztvyEkplRnWToT4SYveSvL/C/ijWz/MBbYzxvrNGM0g/1AX8MN+Zaio7+zkFf
 h21qm4rr5rzUfRPIdUwoJ5stfrKQm8P8XnQqAUrJSfNySA1PAG80hJzcKYzUgwOZ+ufw
 AnwXqC9aYYaxTURsHOc5Y2RRo/81GAe3eJ0EVunkSroZ13DmCLjvkhDajEK9SCiUlMYf
 S5Z64/1Nu0SSKAWAH9fKasUAKAYgIbVLp1PQ72r5VZSzkGXJ/pKQVQ21y7QDP5edCA1k
 uCIeqxUAeNvqS0RCKDeB980aveK2wfUYzG9fhq1pWmq90pg1IJxPNzF072QQ/RSRorGx
 BGuA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=5Z39GEsBjORwISWaicADLx/WIDAI0mi6e6e1RcsPWMM=;
 b=Dr5SBcU/m+mJ0NIGAwuSbkVDfMu1Wm3vzkVgwoiSDJ0hw3ABCZ6dO8LfjRujy3xOPY
 fEyGFHl5LbNITdyhLG5JQlFX7c1mqUpxRBURbGvYjK42mF77hXt68qb8IXQqBrt0tSQV
 6igRJl7SVc0VWUb1lC1Sgj+PC048fkF9rlP7V7c5qudPSXSyHTUPGPrWyEW7HwgzJ3jn
 dz1KdeWLrSU60Js9vIXXKuqwNewTnpezLlWUz4/X5Dc1jpJalhe5/gDEN3xE4lP/zytb
 KqJm3clRsQllwXp75eLLnllVXLIEuEeewhN3X/NeaalgT6ZtPPf1hBnZPR2yn5r1dcGD
 1BXA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora93SSgxR7z5y0Bywbue1Kb6MyqxJTIM1/b5XgR5SJagsDicjjFU
 02glghdLXkDZGHn9hwb2DN9HJHUT40QQSQvu+BKmyAYhyBo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1t0ihLyCpBHaSdt83/XU4QlvmLD5NlfbDRkgHHq0RDizamnWrtlJkwnAG+Casu4dSHq09K6By8AJ0cjSIU9ku0=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:ba3:0:b0:618:fced:5bd4 with SMTP id
 32-20020a9d0ba3000000b00618fced5bd4mr1213979oth.230.1656863862225; Sun, 03
 Jul 2022 08:57:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Antonio Di Bacco <a.dibacco.ks@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2022 17:57:31 +0200
Message-ID: <CAO8pfFnMXA71rweMs6j4eK3w0trkWqxHfe9Ek1kDT55v7r1MKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: rte_eth_tx_burst() always returns 0 in tight loop
To: users@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org

I'm trying to send packets continuously in a  tight loop with a burst
size of 8 and packets are 9600 bytes long.
If I don't insert a delay after the rte_eth_tx_burst it always returns 0.

What's the explanation of this behaviour ?

Best regards,
Antonio.