From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35AA7A04A4 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 15:52:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 220DC40DF6; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 15:52:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-lj1-f170.google.com (mail-lj1-f170.google.com [209.85.208.170]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22EA54067B for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 15:52:18 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-lj1-f170.google.com with SMTP id s25so22192110lji.5 for ; Tue, 01 Mar 2022 06:52:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Gt9xbgiuG6OaTlFBaPgoPHCcXrd22wn0FQY3gJPHawo=; b=fiFwiQVuQ2lKh80ZORGo69hBnSQFmfFFt0+V/Jld1IvEgU+xvA9Rf9u/N8yyNQ4P7E IJAqzsAzEPpJXZc44aN7KceaG0i7zIvN1/M0smQjc+BmqJRQgn34VRugsRdM78bjtfdm Mev2uO6ot7ahZqzCX499teOjuY8bkduXilyHsXD/EEh6OhCDyodQdHOBx9i72rAwCOyv 8ikKSdKIF5Wyoz3cc+CjUpneEClS28mrWKv3CdWls8LSeoLamz4JFub67HKfeEiEVuO5 +UGREAuPZjHQUaG81bN01ap0PRdYOGL2aNWVbN8vxdegGEG5JjPm0SXViBZIQKezypK9 kn6A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Gt9xbgiuG6OaTlFBaPgoPHCcXrd22wn0FQY3gJPHawo=; b=3T0J2sd6ruHg7yONW+tD7Bf4KNxjH51uWipKWRxpQbxe9VTgOb/sVlzsrdesLwssUy qfZ8/b2LdUKIBAFrS/chjj3buMQ10KuJidsUKnLolNitCyxsQMF8xn7x4PdDMMyUgLa/ +/tAY7THwHe6QpH1W9F7N8peo5r13Wqd+xxFIJh9rv8jVl5o0Vi4rc+s+egW5h2H80TL HCQH6QIeMe/HnlU6OZc8Y4P7koaPXdymxll6fJVP29q3aaXoaaCLVBuqDtvEX8TR517s F4ltUe9Tdy79qYfN+3YE3ICNXV3ZYROdKJQg8R508x8xhYb00+vaBctdkONaBztLq9MP /aUw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531wxwNfz+rFKAcC1H/fAVVco76/qRD826db+nrAwsdokDZpE4HZ Zin2iVzbMhFbrJowTGPYn2B5xtsu9HIYYMlbvC6B1Ia4OqE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyBZrJBFxs8GiT7wyndDlSo3rDfjDyFrePAlqmfxXC0pfSm8HPQZC5yVnJCOYEqCaYJZ/E70h3Ywe3Bqj6ehKM= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9bd4:0:b0:246:f5d:13af with SMTP id w20-20020a2e9bd4000000b002460f5d13afmr17246402ljj.234.1646146337526; Tue, 01 Mar 2022 06:52:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Antonio Di Bacco Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2022 15:52:06 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: DPDK on isolated cores but I still see interrupts To: users@dpdk.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b259a305d9294fb1" X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org --000000000000b259a305d9294fb1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I am trying to run a DPDK application on x86_64 Machine (Ubuntu 20.04) on isolated cores. I expected not to have interrupts on isolated cores but I still have a lot of CAL (*Function call interrupts*) interrupts and LOC interrupts (*Local timer interrupts*). Is there any setting in DPDK to stop those too? Regards. --000000000000b259a305d9294fb1 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I am trying to run a DPDK application on x86_64 Machine (U= buntu 20.04) on isolated cores.
I expected not to have inter= rupts on isolated cores but I still have a lot of CAL (Function call int= errupts) interrupts and LOC interrupts (Local timer interrupt= s). Is there any setting in DPDK to stop those too?
Regards.
--000000000000b259a305d9294fb1--