From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <batmanustc@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-qt0-f179.google.com (mail-qt0-f179.google.com
 [209.85.216.179]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAFE7324E;
 Wed, 21 Jun 2017 05:35:57 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-qt0-f179.google.com with SMTP id i2so261235qta.3;
 Tue, 20 Jun 2017 20:35:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=d45wWFappxz8BWErVHoLWSOZiU4vYZzwqmozjIlUgdY=;
 b=phmuiZlnFmmnlLBjk3oK7Z97eY9uoxlrB2y0G2yla/rHprGsfWOwqVEAHFCtj5Alym
 AvJqGTr6c6Yc6PmdAqFc3385nApl5iesQRwzErw6Jp56kAUg0+CZVsocFP3/pmOLqmIa
 GyBvZYZEiAIcUReOHhD2qyfNQaMjyfMK4kuS4ZR+LQGKAwAXEKnGSJlGid45oTwWftP7
 ady+/k/T+GcRu6iT60sGyJwKPJGZCb21MYrrsbFjDtxobbOrvqFsbbm4VGfV+TxTT03w
 Y44JofWyTLGjmEtZCpXXxBwPxjuiKUcW3Bp9T6RiZOXDWBktgf+Up0fHtADXrOQmMTru
 gBkA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to;
 bh=d45wWFappxz8BWErVHoLWSOZiU4vYZzwqmozjIlUgdY=;
 b=DBGxEsDufEOvFKJHrpbXn3JoVy4mCBbgCZnJCblw7Sn3JqbS8LYUxXrkoaDO2xUcVP
 4uOKogSzRIvVz0Camz46C5XKXToB1OU4xf2KWuGsbP0GH2q0KX4EEnB7AYeknrYIZkXI
 gOtSUkLj2OISRAd/JfJ6+jQszYVmFNBkVtwQMldm2eqzXQh/s72mfsEoMifphl7Akkko
 6SSo3uQ0l+nNnniPGGkdijDNKYJa727iu5HLPXeaSmtF0BT41kCt0G+4dIDZmFBXHH1K
 xHrDa2uUycu0dHCcrauZ4/Up1Y7YQy7M2008mUgZeqrkno7Qw/5J19A/l7SjHNS4rEtp
 gSSg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOxM0ggDhiW+fqVhk6AE6c3paRNMdjmDoDXwXHA+JuoCA0/V624U
 vhOf/f9WD6Q6uArWfcwnBb/nZq19iA==
X-Received: by 10.200.42.177 with SMTP id b46mr37029884qta.122.1498016157005; 
 Tue, 20 Jun 2017 20:35:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.90.72 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 20:35:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAOE=1Z1Bbgb494m6mYRnX1-80eT0tSnF0F6zNM7efEie4rd7DA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOE=1Z1Bbgb494m6mYRnX1-80eT0tSnF0F6zNM7efEie4rd7DA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Sam <batmanustc@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 11:35:56 +0800
Message-ID: <CAOE=1Z1LJr9rpaEQ9+b7D5vM3N=Wy0oGunRnzoQ79x3dWA3oaw@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org, users@dpdk.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, 
 qemu-discuss@nongnu.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Will huge page have negative effect on guest vm in
	qemu enviroment?
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 03:35:58 -0000

BTW, we also think about use ovs-dpdk in docker enviroment, but test result
said it's not good idea, we don't know why.

2017-06-21 11:32 GMT+08:00 Sam <batmanustc@gmail.com>:

> Hi all,
>
> We plan to use DPDK on HP host machine with several core and big memory.
> We plan to use qemu-kvm enviroment. The host will carry 4 or more guest vm
> and 1 ovs.
>
> Ovs-dpdk is much faster then normal ovs, but to use ovs-dpdk, we have to
> enable huge page globally.
>
> My question is, will huge page enabled globally have negative effect on
> guest vm's memory orperate or something? If it is, how to prevent this, or
> could I enable huge page on some core or enable huge page for a part of
> memory?
>
> Thank you~
>