From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-f176.google.com (mail-io0-f176.google.com [209.85.223.176]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87B07952 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 18:17:44 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-io0-f176.google.com with SMTP id 9so28339045iom.1 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 09:17:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=ht1OLJcE6tWEH6QsqeZO7CNERQizxBzx+g6KyWpWy/8=; b=Kn2hJzGtv63H4ZdkBQ0bN2f8jBMIOsR9XIV54iG2ot8Ppnlbr6nEwWmVxsdtIXuKLb S06ltqb80kjY3vgeuL1icsDB2/Gk1hmUYlc4OgxP9RnZZIEu+Qiokt0s8TfLD9/s+Pze 2w9DD+TG6RN07mO8T5U4ohWQJ6PchSjOrz1mZelxFBUyAWl6Goq5z4qvMYwdqmkAGLh0 j/25GSSq7+0TFiGNUS+LDUWBnM8HwLh/0z5McuKY2Mnj++6nVWBtPSLK5BhGm0MEFp/2 Oud/MAmC/s5ykMQPPOyAWVWf4DAlatFTkDgNsI5PsqA3CwgjmVmQkimb+1zipSWFUmq0 F3sQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ht1OLJcE6tWEH6QsqeZO7CNERQizxBzx+g6KyWpWy/8=; b=czC2xkZRlrGz+spXphvmIBBF0p5SNUJXUO8XBslxUQS/ZCNqKxcO98bTyYdrsRs+BV SNTYeu4jFmUh4vFaXoIctn9FDu82o4gapCjLObH3viQ/b6O3kTLhY7+c9T8+DuCBnhOH tGUkco0xCI66l9N6M5/O6SXV17J5u6fo5ok+FGB6379mUgaTwcGC+c8kifnL1tt0X2rU yUhz0H/D1QOzmjgfLWfxMZPO9lnD+WvcrzA3MqGmGRmTybhlPxo7CoEpaAqG2XY2VjEy KgzToCluW2GqyYul48+qfoo13ZAGpmSoFw8GOf4MjYdry8zIuuw+7WeQJVR96IrLn22I B6SA== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQAuEsV0nApbeyjrGe+LOIYMwHjFyeTQb7tgM9AhvoCTEL+AgpPIYVJChq089tBAnm6yPnDzxXWj4hodg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.132.162 with SMTP id o34mr18794549ioi.154.1455124664044; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 09:17:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.118.195 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 09:17:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20160210091215.2f0e7081@xeon-e3> Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 09:17:43 -0800 Message-ID: From: Stephen Hemminger To: Nick Allen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Cc: users@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Unable to Bind Device in VirtualBox VM X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 17:17:44 -0000 KVM/QEMU On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Nick Allen wrote: > What is typically used instead of VirtualBox? I'd be happy to try an > alternative. Ideally, it would be something that could run across > different host operating systems; including OS X and Linux. > > Thanks for your thoughts. > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Stephen Hemminger > wrote: > > On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 08:45:20 -0500 > > Nick Allen wrote: > > > >> Problem: I am unable to bind a virtual NIC using DPDK 2.2.0 that I > >> created inside of a Ubuntu 14.04 guest running in VirtualBox 5.0.14 on > >> OS X 10.11.3 on a 2015 Macbook Pro. Here is the error that I am > >> seeing. > >> > > > > Do you mean the virtio NIC? > > VirtualBox has a non-standard implementation of virtio and I suspect > > the feature negotiation isn't working. Could be a virtualbox bug. > > > > Since virtualbox is not open source, I don't use or test it. > > > > -- > Nick Allen >