From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3003F46441 for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2025 05:37:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A518B402D6; Sat, 22 Mar 2025 05:37:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-ed1-f48.google.com (mail-ed1-f48.google.com [209.85.208.48]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 307A1402A7 for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2025 05:37:01 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-ed1-f48.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5e5c7d6b96fso4701132a12.3 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2025 21:37:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1742618220; x=1743223020; darn=dpdk.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=1jMxxHq0u/+e9rXJJH2lEF021g7B+/Q0Mh/4/92Eqwk=; b=AErx8pVwXQ9KuZz7BmhXmRGg3v5khNtbuOQhsGYMTFH0e3ENvEviW9+nn5kxi+mDeg tCqjZNByeSEREPzHwyAk6ST9xURfr307FulOky/XDT7zvVHb6Zaj0xPQmI1Lo0YZRhOW Rrey0TyrM5VdghMIRsmqw/2IjKNMuf0yJHwT5RN/wba0/+ZQKZd1Lu2ktxl/n9C0GXpO DChDF+zOP/It7h+9tK5WTwbH61RbBoZ1USH5sW05+O0ubhKSsKKCXc0JFMChPmu6UlI+ Clk0fKJz0DTIIe2kx4hUgJqjDwP5yzp53VoGCnLEQDr6/plUi7zFa6BnpGCMqLi8vmin WWoA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1742618220; x=1743223020; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=1jMxxHq0u/+e9rXJJH2lEF021g7B+/Q0Mh/4/92Eqwk=; b=ABWdX6vN7UUgKc8Nw2Sk3FxG6jwq47TEkjzP9jSp8um6K2Lyg2yIPERLMx74NuRxYx i/buz1BzCV1WVvdN9RyYA1yOz+DcjK6MLVcKOukBcqIj3yqCFj+5JRMZ7TnbrcNhWw/7 2sjVnzqGFv8mgPpbQcxQOfehcLdT6z6Jo89doDXeGfX+5TfkHg359cZ5BDqWAQUd+xya QQkEL/oCG7TO4Xk183fRqB5TpItkpp9xy9CQDJOG87e5xmKgQ3MbBqEqhMKc9MieuCQ2 5zsxD5qmCu3F14hXST379mvBvV6ustSZugYYD6dPwQS1c6K/jBJt++fwjKtBGXb2DyWc 9IWw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz+867/KyuIW00APRhw61s0mdbHF8tTD6XbYcjKNlTBGyK+DVAX g8maT6HSuNBcnd4l5w8bdy1b7dQT9LZktHpPi5vQT8d9+rK7gJOnvq8gEceoQCmiVxPIb6ejreQ rrsWOOBgt+Me3W9xrOqTeeNoCWcnn+h2jA6I= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctT1h3+WkUGYoeI0L/X2dHJck8xr6FExWPIzksFF1C1UQv7Jd4VtxwMpOqI5/k /pA6i5Z+x+rtrHbtf6o+93w5f2LcbBF3AACpmny6l5I5oUaJLmdLmpEYSoU4xVJkp7MmyS+xASn kpqfvB+Dg6wmMJA+uqg0XKc31j5wxa X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFTcDwvMNkEJUOOLOC00+8jiZmOocUQtOfOICiaOi/oRB1BYhUtBhzof4q4Ts9Qcz/WKbq4YpIaI+tXn99U4XE= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:5252:b0:5e5:dbcd:185e with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5ebcd433fdemr5458971a12.13.1742618219892; Fri, 21 Mar 2025 21:36:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Trey Harrison Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 21:36:48 -0700 X-Gm-Features: AQ5f1Jpjq_nq87RfpJULbe0mHwNF5MPOm7dlSUG7CrPTWmFWXev5zFf4T6KKU1o Message-ID: Subject: Intel 800/700 series support for RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_SEND_ON_TIMESTAMP? To: users@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org It seems that there is no support for RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_SEND_ON_TIMESTAMP on Intel's 700/800 series chips in any DPDK release (although, there is support for the 225/226 chips). I have done as thorough of a search on this as I can, but wanted to reach out to actual devs before giving up. I guess I am hoping to simply confirm, from anyone with knowledge of the subject, that there is in fact no such support in any forthcoming patches / DPDK releases / driver revisions / etc. It would also be interesting to know whether the hardware is even capable of this feature - if so, maybe it would not be too complicated to implement it? Especially since there is an example in net/igc to work from.. Thanks! Trey