Hello,I draw a flow via asciiflow to explain myself better. Problem is after transmitting packets(mbufs) , it never puts in the kni->free_q to back to the original pool. Each cycle, it allocates another 32 units that cause leaks. Or I am missing something.I already tried the rte_eth_tx_done_cleanup() function but it didn't fix anything.I am working on a patch to fix this issue but I am not sure if there is another way.Best regards.unsigned
rte_kni_rx_burst(struct rte_kni *kni, struct rte_mbuf **mbufs, unsigned int num)
{
unsigned int ret = kni_fifo_get(kni->tx_q, (void **)mbufs, num);
/* If buffers removed, allocate mbufs and then put them into alloc_q *//* Question, how to test buffers is removed or not?*/
if (ret)
kni_allocate_mbufs(kni);
return ret;
}Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>, 8 May 2023 Pzt, 19:18 tarihinde şunu yazdı:On Mon, 8 May 2023 09:01:41 +0300
Yasin CANER <yasinncaner@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Stephen,
>
> Thank you for response, it helps me a lot. I understand problem better.
>
> After reading mbuf library (
> https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/prog_guide/mempool_lib.html) i realized that
> 31 units allocation memory slot doesn't return to pool!
If receive burst returns 1 mbuf, the other 31 pointers in the array
are not valid. They do not point to mbufs.
> 1 unit mbuf can be freed via rte_pktmbuf_free so it can back to pool.
>
> Main problem is that allocation doesn't return to original pool, act as
> used. So, after following rte_pktmbuf_free
> <http://doc.dpdk.org/api/rte__mbuf_8h.html#a1215458932900b7cd5192326fa4a6902>
> function,
> i realized that there is 2 function to helps to mbufs back to pool.
>
> These are rte_mbuf_raw_free
> <http://doc.dpdk.org/api/rte__mbuf_8h.html#a9f188d53834978aca01ea101576d7432>
> and rte_pktmbuf_free_seg
> <http://doc.dpdk.org/api/rte__mbuf_8h.html#a006ee80357a78fbb9ada2b0432f82f37>.
> I will focus on them.
>
> If there is another suggestion, I will be very pleased.
>
> Best regards.
>
> Yasin CANER
> Ulak